Search Advanced SearchView Cart   Checkout   
 Location:  Home » video » Gothic » Dracula 2000  
Categories
music
h.r. giger
vampire: masquerade
esoterica
apparel
video
body art - tattoo
jewelry
HALLOWEEN
women's boots
men's boots
Info
about us
links
posters
Related Categories
• Gothic
By Theme
Horror
Subcategories
Romantic Comedies
Romantic Drama
Preschool
Kindergarten
Elementary School
Middle & High School
College
Post-Graduate
Digital Sound
Dolby
Surround Sound
Dracula 2000
Dracula 2000

zoom enlarge 
Director: Patrick Lussier
Actors: Gerard Butler, Justine Waddell, Jonny Lee Miller, Christopher Plummer, Colleen Fitzpatrick
Studio: Dimension
Category: DVD

List Price: $14.99
Buy Used: $2.24
You Save: $12.75 (85%)



New (46) Used (62) Collectible (1) from $2.24

Avg. Customer Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars 199 reviews
Sales Rank: 5104

Format: Closed-captioned, Color, Dvd-video, Special Edition, Widescreen, Ntsc
Language: English (Original Language)
Rating: R (Restricted)
Number Of Items: 1
Running Time: 99
Aspect Ratio: 2.35:1
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.3
Dimensions (in): 7.4 x 4.7 x 0.6

MPN: DISD21678D
ISBN: 0788826964
UPC: 786936145038
EAN: 9780788826962
ASIN: B00003CXSD

Theatrical Release Date: 2000
Release Date: July 3, 2001
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Condition: Item in Very Good condition. MAY NOT contain all original artwork and materials. Case/artwork MAY show wear and/or have stickers affixed. 30 day guarantee!

Similar Items:

  • Attila
  • Timeline (Widescreen Edition)
  • Dear Frankie
  • Beowulf & Grendel
  • The Phantom of the Opera (Widescreen Edition)

Editorial Reviews:

Product Description
Studio: Buena Vista Home Video Release Date: 09/05/2006 Run time: 99 minutes Rating: R

Amazon.com
As a director, Wes Craven has been able to infuse his horror movies with humor and some smart, often genuinely creepy, thrills, even on his lowest-budgeted films. As a producer of horror movies, well, his record has been spotty at best. Craven tapped his longtime editor Patrick Lussier to direct Dracula 2000, and the movie ends up with all the good and bad of "a Wes Craven production." A modern-day update of the Dracula legend, the script has some genuinely good ideas. Christopher Plummer (The Insider) takes a relatively juicy role as Van Helsing, owner of an antiques shop specializing in ancient weapons. He takes exception to how his namesake was portrayed in Bram Stoker's classic novel, which he's more than happy to tell his assistant (Jonny Lee Miller, "Sick Boy" from Trainspotting) without telling him the whole story. When Omar Epps leads a band of high-tech criminals to break into Van Helsing's high security vault (thinking that with so much security there's got to be something extremely valuable in there), what they end up stealing is the body of Dracula, who of course awakens from his slumber. When the story shifts to New Orleans, where Van Helsing's estranged daughter is working for the local Virgin Megastore (here metaphor is replaced by product placement), Dracula is drawn to her. The undead start to multiply, and the vampire hunt resumes. Another excellent idea deals with a new origin to Dracula, flashing back to biblical times to explain his aversion to silver and crosses. But there is a downside. Under the inept direction of Lussier the movie is never scary, inspiring instead an occasional feeling of pity for the actors. Overall, this a vampire movie for the mind, not the heart. --Andy Spletzer


Customer Reviews:   Read 194 more reviews...

4 out of 5 stars Part great, part dud, Gerry perfect----   March 30, 2005
 56 out of 61 found this review helpful

First, watch the DVD deleted scenes, extended scenes and audition featuring Gerard Butler. That will get you in the right mood! Then start the film.

The first 30 minutes are a mess. After the opening scenes with Christopher Plummer as Van Helmsing, that lays the groundwork for the story, they could have skipped all the scenes about the stealing of the coffin and just had Plummer tell Simon (Johnny Lee Miller) "we been robbed!".

But the young people and the robbery and taking the coffin by plane and it crashing - all could be handled by voice-over. This is just a mess and not one of the actors are interesting or have any charisma. Especially Solina (Jennifer Esposito) going into the vault, dark and creepy and skulls and gad! you get the picture. We are in for a fright! Bah!!! So lame.

Our first great shot of Dracula (Butler), is on the plane when he walks into the section of the plane and reaches out for Solina - and like any sane woman, she goes right to him. The love bite is next. Um Hmmmm! In the meantime, Mary Van Helsing is having dreams/nightmares seeing Dracula in her mirror. She is speechless, and we are too. OMG! She keeps saying "wake up - you're dreaming" but then he comes close and sniffs her and says "you're real" and I have to pause the film and fan myself.

Troubled Mary goes to the church in New Orleans where the priest is a childhood friend, to get some answers about her Mother and as he is putting the candles out and turns to Mary - it is him, the big D. A gaze to die for. The next is Dracula perched like a gargoyle on the church parapet above the Mardi Gras revelers and he says "Farewell, Princess." Perfect!

Down at street level, he walks among the drunken revelers with a bemused look. There is a giant TV screen showing dancers silhouettes, there are beads and coins tossed at him as he looks on with a knowing smile. He watches the giant screen flash images of atom bombs, rock stars, lingerie ads and women mud wrassling and says "Brilliant." Great satire!

His walk through the "Virgin" record store is iconic, with all the young gals turning to look as he passes by. He gets Lucy, Mary's friend to take him to their home. His comment to Lucy, when she can't come up with a word to describe Mary's mothers decor of the house "catholic?" is priceless. And to her query "would you like some coffee?" he says " I don't drink----------coffee." Timed perfectly with just the right look. And of course, he has her on the bed and on the ceiling! Faint!!!

It is like there are two films here - one a brilliant satire with great lines. And the other an incoherent teen/slasher/bloodfest. But it is almost possible to just start anywhere after the first 30 minutes and the story is interesting and makes sense of the Judas theme.

The cinematography has some beautiful scenes. The Red Hall - the curtains blowing and the eastern theme music for the desert and cross scenes. The few lines Dracula(Butler) utters are great and with timing and marvelous expression. "The Bible is propaganda." "You think you can defend her with the Bible." To Mary "Everything I have is yours; and all you are is mine." (Shades of The Phantom.)

Dracula to the Jesus Cross "I give them (revelers below) what they crave most. All the pleasures you denied them."
And his gesture to Mary - arm and hand out as the camera pans away and he says "come let us feast" and the kisses. Wow!! Nellie bar the door. I want some of that! (8/10 - would have been higher but that first 30 minutes is just bad!)



4 out of 5 stars Dracula in the Modern World   July 15, 2002
 37 out of 40 found this review helpful

This was a modernized version based on the characters from the original novel by Bram
Stoker. Here we find Van Helsing still alive in modern times having appointed himself the keeper of Dracula's corpse because Dracula could not truly be killed. Dracula lays prone in a death-like state in a vault and Van Helsing is using Dracula's blood, siphoned through leeches, to keep himself alive for all these years. Then some young hoods steal the coffin thinking it contains valuables and unwittingly help Dracula escape his prison. The ensuing battle between Van Helsing and Dracula to save Van Helsing's daughter from joining the undead leaves behind plenty of corpses. In a surprise conclusion we learn who Dracula really is . . . and in this movie they do not claim he is really Vlad Tepesh, Prince of Wallachia as in most other movies. I realize by the description is sounds like some rehash of an old Hammer film but this movie is slick, well presented and very entertaining. If you like vampire movies it's a great addition to your collection.



5 out of 5 stars Surprisingly good   December 26, 2004
 33 out of 38 found this review helpful

After reading some of the other reviews of this movie, I must admit, I was sceptical about how good it would be. Fortunately, though, I was pleasantly surprised. It was great! But then again, I should have known Wes Craven would come through with the goods.

Some people complained that this movie tries to do too much--it has comedy, horror, suspense and a whole lot of other genres thrown in. But those people should stop trying to pigeon hole things, and just learn to sit back and enjoy the ride! And what a ride! Sure, this isn't the greatest movie I've ever seen, but it is VERY entertaining and very well cast. The actors are brilliant, and whilst I was a bit cold towards the actress playing the part of Mary at first, I did warm to her later on as Wes Craven let her develop into what he is so well known for including in his movies: a strong, capable, kick ass female character!

The storyline was true to many aspects of the original Dracula--enough to keep the diehard fans happy, anyway--and whilst at first I wondered about the fact that silver can be used to kill the vamps (I had thought this was only good for slaying werewolves) this aspect was eventually explained very satisfactorily. The only part of the movie I couldn't quite fathom while I was watching it was why Mary would run into a graveyard to try to escape Dracula--wouldn't a church have made a better sanctuary, or anywhere else but a graveyard, for that matter? But then I thought, perhaps she didn't really want to escape him...

I must admit, though, my favourite part of the movie was when Drac said, "I don't drink...coffee." Brilliant!

Thankfully, this is a much better movie than 'Bram Stoker's Dracula', which was overhyped, overrated and inappropriately named (calling it Bram Stoker's Dracula was a travesty, since it differed from Bram's book in oh-so-many-I-can't-count-them-all ways!) Dracula 2000 is well-acted, well-written and scary enough to satisfy, unlike Bram Stoker's Dracula, in which the scariest things were Gary Oldman's hair and Keanu Reeves' acting (seriously, who thought that casting him as an Englishman would be believable? Someone who also thinks Dame Edna is a real woman, no doubt!)

I'm not just a fan of vampires but someone who has written a book or three about them, and I have to say, I liked this. You probably will too. Enjoy!

P.S. If you're going to read the other reviews listed below this one, then watch out for ones written by 'unsounddrummer' and 'Alien Warrior Woman'. These both contain spoilers that will ruin this film's clever twists for you. I HATE SPOILERS! Like vampires, they suck!

And while we're on the subject of other reviews, I just want to say a few things about one written by Ms. Aimee R. H. Masion, which made me laugh. Firstly, she classes herself as a Vampirologist. Er, what university did that degree come from Aimee? The University of Inmydreams? Aimee says that Dracula would never have wasted blood because blood is food for vampires. Has Aimee never played with her food before, then? Never had a food fight just for fun? Seriously, though, Dracula wasn't looking for an all-you-can-eat human buffet, like a fat undead tourist on a cruise ship of the damned, nor was he thinking about what his parents told him when he was little, that he should eat up all his blood because there are starving vampires in Africa. What he was actually trying to do was subdue the enemy humans and convert them into vampires as quickly as possible. That's a messy business. Hence the blood spillage. Elementary, my dear Aimee. But as a trained Vampirologist you really ought to have known that!




2 out of 5 stars Ho-hum, so-so film, but intense and watchable Gerard Butler   September 14, 2006
 16 out of 16 found this review helpful

I give this 2.5 stars, and that's mostly because 1. the gimmick/idea that ties together the "whys" of Dracula is interesting and 2. Gerard Butler has amazing screen presence.

The story: Baddies go to steal a hidden treasure (thinking valuable item). This item has been encased and entombed by Van Helsing (yeah, that Van Helsing), the guardian of this particular treasure. As you can guess, it's not jewels or the Holy Grail. It does have to do with blood: Dracula. Baddies get killed/turned. Dracula, who has some kind of psychic connection to Van Helsing's daughter, Mary(estranged from Papa and living in New Orleans pre-Katrina), goes seeking the woman of his dreams. Nothing really interesting or spooky happens. Yes, folks get bitten. Yes, some get killed. Yes, nice guy goes to save Mary from a toothy fate. Sirens do their ho-hum thing to nice guy hero. Dracula has showdown with Mary. And...well...not giving the ending away.

Ultimately, we get a new (to me, anyway) spin on the tale when we find out how Dracula was created, and why silver and sunlight and crucifixes and holy water are feared and hated objects to Vampiredom. It's a somewhat elegant answer, but it can't satisfy for a lackluster preamble to the revelation.

Justine Waddell doesn't do much with her role. Christopher Plummer is rather wasted. Jonny Lee Miller has a few cute lines, but is kind of disposable, if likable. Omar Epps didnt' get a chance to do anything worth watching. (He's much better on HOUSE, where he gets some real characterization and infinitely better dialogue.)

So, there's really only ONE reason to watch this film: Gerard Butler.

Now, putting aside for the moment that it's truly bizarre to have Dracula speak in a Scottish accent--fetching, but odd--one can overcome this oddity by the sheer personal magnetism of the man. He makes clunky lines shine through overwhelming emotive power, some real acting chops, and the physical presence to carry off the role. Oh, if they'd only put better lines into his mouth, and not just sharp canines! Only at the end does he really get to speak and emote and burn. It's lovely to watch, for however briefly. A genuinely excellent choice for Dracula, except that Scottish accent. Weird.

If you're a Butlerian Crushgirl--by all means, rent or buy this. The moments with Mr. Butler are worth the price. When he sniffs Mary, it's the kind of fully-dressed erotic moment that puts all the nude scenes in cinema to shame, and it proves that when you have people with intensity and charisma and screen "itness", an expression, a breathy phrase, these are more sensual than a million displays of nakedness and groaning.

If you're not a G.B. fan, or a serious Jonny Lee or Plummer or whomever else in the film fan, skip it. It's just not very good movie-making. All it's got in the end is the cool historical twist and Gerry Butler. For some of you, that may be enough.

Mir



5 out of 5 stars Dracula 2000   May 4, 2005
 15 out of 15 found this review helpful

The only reason I got this movie was because Gerard Butler was in it, but , as someone else mentioned, it actually is surprisingly good. Gerard Butler is absolutely magnetic and seductive in this film.He's not even shown on the jacket, but, before the film even was finished, he became considered "lead" actor due to his completely mesmerizing performance. It was this film that got him chosen to play the lead in "Phantom of the Opera"Movie better than the great play (which has abeen playing non-stop since 1986 by the way- making over $6 billion worldwide. See "Dracula" even if only to see Butler.

Powered by Associate-O-Matic

T-shirts, Posters

Pentagram T-shirts, bags, etc...


Gothic Posters

Related Links
Dark Videos

Terra Naturals - All Natural Products






© Darkpub.com 2001-2007. All rights reserved. Domain Registration and Hosting