Welles' bravula mise en scene, with the help of Russel Metty's startling black-and-white lighting and stunning camera movement, transform Venice, California into a chaotic frontier town between the US and Mexico. Charlton Heston, often refereed to as the most wooden actor in American cinema, gives a performance of his life as a Mexican cop. His casting may sound funny, but please forget that it's the same guy who played BEN HUR and Moses in the TEN COMMANDMENTS watching this movie then his highly energetic, rather over-the-top performance is actually convincing, especially as opposed to Welles' deliciously vicious portrayal of a corrupted American cop. It was actually Heston who suggested Universal that Welles would not only act in this film but also direct it, so you should give him some credit. Janet Leigh plays Heston's all-American wife "from Philadelphia", and is also quite marvelous in the way she turns out to be something else that we first think she is. With Hitchcock's PSYCHO and Anthony Mann's THE NAKED SPUR, this is probably her best performance. Metty's contrasty black-and-white photography also makes her very beautiful. She looks always better in blacho and white than in color, don't you think so?

This unorthodox casting works, because the film is a bigger than life caricature. It is often unbelievably funny indeed, which makes the viewer unconfortable because the thematic matter treated in this film is certainly not a humorous one. Of course that was Welles' intention, to challenge and provoke the audience. The magnificent supporting cast including Welles' favorite actors Ray Collins and Joe Cotten (from the Mercury Theatre and CITIZEN KANE) and Akim Tamirof hightens the caricature nature of the film. Joseph Caleia who plays Welles' side-kick proves to be a marvelous actor, one of the best performance in the entire Welles filmography (that is, from another actor than Orson himself). The dark hummour of the film reaches one of the darkest, poignant criticism about justice and how the idea is executed in reality. How much is it allowed for a police officer to execute justice, what is the thin line between justice and the abuse of justice that leads to fascism and a police state? This important question in our modern society is the theme Welles attacks in this film. But as in most of Welles great achievments, the political/social concerns turns out to be only one aspect of the story. It also becomes deeply deeply emotional in the way it becomes a personal moral conflict as well.

There used to be two versions of the film. The one hour and a half theatrical released version and the nearly two hours restored version. Though the longer version includes shots that were not done by Welles and Metty, the story is more comprehensible and Welles often proclaimed that he preferred the longer one (it was Universal who made the retakes and made the longer version, and why they did not released this one is a big mystery). But in the early 90's, a memo by Welles suggesting re-editing the 110 minutes version was discovered. So this so-called newly restored version (which should be called a re-construction since this version never existed; a great injustice that Welles was not allowed to touch the footage he himself had directed) was made, which is now on this DVD; with a beautiful digital wide-screen transfer that captures the deep blacks, menacing shadows and brilliant whites of Russel Metty's cinematography.

The heaviest changes are made on the sequence that you might have imagined no re-editing could be done; the celebrated 3 minutes long take which opens the film. This newly reconstructed version (and Welles' memo reproduced as a supplement of this DVD) confirms one important aspect of Welles' works that he was almost obsessive about, but few critics have been noticing; his close attention in the use of sound. You can also notice his obbsession about making a film that sound distinctively different from conventional movies by listening to the audio commenatary by Bogdanovich on THE LADY FROM SHANGHAI-DVD (and reading the huge book of Welles-Bogdanovich interview edited by Jonathan Rosenbaum THIS IS ORSON WELLES; check the amazon.com bookstore!).

Some TOUCH OF EVIL fanatics may regret that the famous Henry Manicini's opening theme music is now gone, but one has to admit that in the way Welles envisioned, the opening long take becomes far more powerful. As a stylish echnical tour-de-force as it is, the opening shot has now an almost documentary feeling about it, so immediate and raw, which obviously must have been the touch that Welles intended in this picture.

Though there are not too many obvious changes made in what you see from the former restored version (except that most of the explanatory re-takes done by Harry Keller are mostly gone now), what you hear is very different and the atmosphere you get from the entire film is now something else. The film that used to be concerned as the ultimate example of Welles stylism has now became a great example of Welles' realism. His "realism" is something different from Rossellini's realism or Ken Loach realism. I would venture to say it's closer to something like Scorsese realism or Oliver Stone realism (if Orson were alive today, he ceratinly would have worked with Robert Richardson as his DP), and this amazing realistic feeling you get from the new TOUCH OF EVIL will certainly blow your mind away, even to those whom who have seen the movie for more than 20 times.


Versions   June 12, 2000
 67 out of 70 found this review helpful

Yes, "Touch of Evil" is definately a classic.

A couple of words about the aspect ratio as well as the various versions of the film that are available.

TOE was originally released at 1.33:1 -- it was never filmed as a widescreen movie.

There are three versions of the film floating around on video. The first was the theatrical release version that was edited without Welles' approval. It includes some sequences shot by other individuals at Universal to make the story easier to understand. This was the only version available up through the mid-80's.

Around 1985, Universal attempted a restoration edit of the film that was closer to Welle's opinion. Released to art house theatres and on video, this is the commonly available version found on home video from Universal. The restoration did have its detractors -- the restoration, in addition to putting back more material intended for the film by Welles, also put in more of the material shot by the studio without Welle's permission.

The third version, and probably the closest to Welles' intent, was released in 1999. In this case, original memos from Welles were used to re-edit the existing material and to eliminate the material not shot by Welles. The film also includes the fantastic opening sequence of the film without the opening titles superimposed -- the credits are seen at the end of the film. Also, the parallel stories in the film are more closely intertwined in the editing throughout the entire film. (In the original and first restoration, the plot lines are developed in a more conventional fashion.) This is the version due to be released on DVD.


aka "Touch of Crap"   December 15, 2000
 61 out of 82 found this review helpful

First of all, "Touch of Evil" is one of my top 5 favorite movies, and one of the most important and influential movies ever made. However, it seems to me that importance or influence doesn't mean anything to the Universal Home Video, at least in the case of this movie, because, the DVD treatment is really in one word "Horrible!". Orson Welles' "Touch of Evil", has inspired and influenced so many filmmakers ever since its release, from the French New Wave directors like Francois Truffaut and Jean-Luc Godard, to George Lucas and Martin Scorsese and beyond, that it doesn't seem to me to be ridiculous or nitpicking to expect special treatment on the DVD, or at least decent treatment. The only positive thing about this DVD is the first 5 seconds of the opening menu. The picture and sound quality are probably the worst that I have seen yet on a major studio DVD release. The picture is very blurry and it's very difficult to see what's going on because of the darkness, and it's not as a result of the dark cinematography, because, I've seen this movie in a theater, on TV airings, and on the original VHS, and the picture on this DVD is the absolute worst, it's almost worse than on one of the budget DVDs. Also, I'm not even sure as to whether or not Orson Welles intended it to be in widescreen format, it seems to play better in full-screen format. The sound quality is also really bad, it's very inconsistent, especially considering that Orson Welles considered sound as an extremely important element of the movies and used sound creatively to add dramatic impact to the overall film experience, which was another one the many innovative aspects of his movies. The only real bonus feature is the 50-page memo that Orson Welles sent to the studio heads containing his passionate suggestions for changes, and pleas for what not to alter. I'm sure that the Orson's 50-page memo including to sucker in people who loves this movie, but, it's not something that you can't attain if you really want without buying this DVD. They should have included the behind-the-scenes documentary, a commentary track with some of the stars and supporting actors that are still alive and even some of the people involved in the reconstruction or Peter Bogdonavich who is one of the most avid admirers of Orson Welles, also the previous version or versions of the movie, and even an isolated score track. Come on Universal, even in death Orson Welles still is disrespected by the people at Universal Studios! Overall the treatment of Orson Welles' "Touch of Evil" on this DVD is so bad that it's ridiculous to call it "Restored Collector's Edition", they should have called it "The Suckers Edition of Touch of Crap"!!!!! Final Warning!!! Don't be a sucker and buy this DVD, you'd be better off buying a couple of blank tapes and recording the documentary and the movie from one of the recent TV airings. After I bought it and saw it I was so dissapointed, I felt like a sucker so I returned it as fast as I could. Hopefully if enough protests are made, they will pay attention and release a real collector's edition or give it to Criterion to give it special treatment.


"And this is where you're going to die..."   July 23, 2003
 42 out of 45 found this review helpful

The story is pretty much known by many that after the heated battle with "Citizen Kane," Orson Welles was never given complete control over his films again. This would lead to the studio editing his movies and changing things he didn't want changed. This was the case with "Touch of Evil," and of course this really upset Welles. Now circumstances are different, as the DVD "Touch of Evil" offers you the restored and uncut version that is as close to Orson Welles' vision as you can get. And the results are pretty amazing, I must admit. "Touch of Evil" is an outstanding film noir that is unlike any you have ever seen.

It all starts with a car explosion that kills two. A Mexican narcotics investigator and a very obsessive and cold police chief are thrown into the investigation. That's only half the story, as the investigator's wife is confronted by a known criminal and his gang of hoodlums that threaten to cause trouble for them. And what's worse is that the police chief doesn't appear to be the most honorable man in the world, and perhaps is even crooked. This all leads to an explosive plot with an unbelievable finale that is both unpredictable and satisfying. It is very clear why "Touch of Evil" is hailed as a classic by many.

It's great to see that the movie has been restored to Welles' original vision. I've never seen the studio version of the film, and I never want to. I'm sure they did a fine job butchering it. Welles has done for "Touch of Evil" what Hitchcock has done for "Psycho." The outcome is an authentic and exhilarating film noir that is very different from any other film noir that is out there.

Charlton Heston is great in his role. He proves to be a pretty convincing Mexican narcotics investigator. Very hard to imagine, but it works on the screen. Orson Welles is unrelenting and chilling as the police chief, Hank Quinlan. No way in the world could the part have been played by anybody else. Janet Leigh also gives an unforgettable performance that gives the movie the extra kick it needs.

The DVD has a few extras. The picture and sound is really good, considering how old of a film it is. It is a very clear-cut transfer that does the movie justice. Extra features included are production notes, cast and crew bios, the original theatrical trailer, and Welles' complete memo to the studio about how he felt about the changes forced upon the film. It would've been nice to see this film get the "2-disk" treatment, but hopefully that will happen sometime in the future. I think many will be impressed with the fact that the film is now uncut and restored, leading to them not being too let down that there aren't many extras.

"Touch of Evil" is a great film that kept my complete attention from start to finish. Some may not like it since the pace can be slow at times, but that is the nature of film noir. The overall product is a dark and haunting film that was groundbreaking then and continues to be groundbreaking now. Highly recommended for huge film buffs, but then again chances are you have already seen it. I was very pleased with the film and it will be one that I will watch again and again. If you're looking for a different and exciting experience, be sure to give it a try. After all, the worst that can happen is you not liking the movie in the end. I think it's worth the risk.


Beware Fake Widescreen   July 30, 2001
 29 out of 33 found this review helpful

Well, once again, Welles' artistic vision has been compromised. Apparently a common practice (SO BEWARE), the makers of this DVD have added fake-widescreen...adding black bars across the top and bottom, thus giving the impression of a wider aspect ratio, when in fact the film was never intended to be "widescreen." In other words, you are being robbed of the upper and lower portions of the picture. Would Orson have approved? NO! Neither should we!