Search Advanced SearchView Cart   Checkout   
 Location:  Home » body art - tattoo » 1945 - Present » The Age of Reagan: A History, 1974-2008  
Categories
music
h.r. giger
vampire: masquerade
esoterica
apparel
video
body art - tattoo
jewelry
HALLOWEEN
women's boots
men's boots
Info
about us
links
posters
Related Categories
• 1945 - Present
20th Century
United States
The Age of Reagan: A History, 1974-2008
The Age of Reagan: A History, 1974-2008

zoom enlarge 
Author: Sean Wilentz
Publisher: Harper
Category: Book

List Price: $27.95
Buy New: $13.35
You Save: $14.60 (52%)



New (47) Used (15) Collectible (2) from $12.35

Avg. Customer Rating: 2.0 out of 5 stars 26 reviews
Sales Rank: 8301

Media: Hardcover
Edition: 1
Number Of Items: 1
Pages: 576
Shipping Weight (lbs): 1.4
Dimensions (in): 9 x 6 x 1.6

ISBN: 0060744804
Dewey Decimal Number: 973.927
EAN: 9780060744809
ASIN: 0060744804

Publication Date: May 1, 2008
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Condition: Brand New!!!

Also Available In:

  • Paperback - The Age of Reagan: A History, 1974-2008 (American History)
  • Audio CD - The Age of Reagan: A History, 1974-2008
  • Audio Download - The Age of Reagan: A History, 1974-2008 (Unabridged)
  • Audio CD - The Age of Reagan: A History, 1974-2008
  • Audio CD - The Age of Reagan: A History, 1974-2008

Similar Items:

  • Nixonland: The Rise of a President and the Fracturing of America
  • The Post-American World
  • Counselor: A Life at the Edge of History
  • What Hath God Wrought: The Transformation of America, 1815-1848 (Oxford History of the United States)
  • The Last Campaign: Robert F. Kennedy and 82 Days That Inspired America

Editorial Reviews:

Product Description

One of the nation's leading historians offers a groundbreaking and provocative chronicle of America's political history since the fall of Nixon.

The past thirty-five years have marked an era of conservatism. Although briefly interrupted in the late 1970s and temporarily reversed in the 1990s, a powerful surge from the right has dominated American politics and government. In The Age of Reagan, Sean Wilentz accounts for how a conservative movement once deemed marginal managed to seize power and hold it, and the momentous consequences that followed.

Ronald Reagan has been the single most important political figure of this age. Without Reagan, the conservative movement would have never been as successful as it was. In his political persona as well as his policies, Reagan embodied a new fusion of deeply right-leaning politics with some of the rhetoric and even a bit of the spirit of Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal and John F. Kennedy's New Frontier. In American political history there have been a few leading figures who, for better or worse, have placed their political stamp indelibly on their times. They include Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, Franklin D. Roosevelt—and Ronald Reagan. A conservative hero in a conservative age, Reagan has been so admired by a minority of historians and so disliked by the others that it has been difficult to evaluate his administration with detachment. Drawing on numerous primary documents that have been neglected or only recently released to the public, as well as on emerging historical work, Wilentz offers invaluable revelations about conservatism's ascendancy and the era in which Reagan was the preeminent political figure.

Vivid, authoritative, and illuminating from start to finish, The Age of Reagan raises profound questions and opens passionate debate about our nation's recent past.




Customer Reviews:   Read 21 more reviews...

5 out of 5 stars Definitely worth reading   May 26, 2008
 59 out of 70 found this review helpful

First off, and for the record: no, I did not vote for Al Gore in the 2000 election. Now, having said that: I thought this was a well-written and thought-provoking book by a preeminent historian, and a great example of 'partisan' history (although I think it's also fair to say that Wilentz does make an honest effort at balanced analysis, and of course his forthright thesis is right there in the title: Reagan, for good or ill, defined his--and our--American era). This book is also far better than the Reagan hagiographies cluttering most bookstores (which I couldn't even be bothered to read, and it would seem that way to even the casual browser, as they're mostly picture books anyway). But Wilentz is also balanced, and even, dare I say, nuanced in his approach to both the man and his time.

You may agree with some of the author's points, and disagree with others, but I assure you, the book itself is very well written, and certainly worth your time and energy to invest in. I bought my copy in a bookstore (remember bookstores?) on an impulse, and I was not disappointed--actually, I finished it in a matter of days. Normally, that would be that, but when I looked at this page on Amazon and saw only one one-star review, I decided to step in. This book is NOT as lopsided or unfair as that reviewer would have you believe, and what's more, the reviewer confessed to not finishing the book. I don't know how to do that, myself, even with books I loathe. But I certainly wouldn't have the audacity to publish a review of a book I didn't finish: not only is that unfair to the author, but it speaks of a mindset that does not allow for the hearing of both sides of an issue. 'Partisan,' anyone?

Now if you'll excuse me, I'm about to start Nixonland, by Rick Perlstein. And if someone had told me that I would be reading two serious history books featuring Reagan and Nixon in their titles two or three weeks ago, I would have raised an eyebrow. And yet, here I go.



1 out of 5 stars "objective and above partisanship . . ." ?????   May 15, 2008
 44 out of 146 found this review helpful

An admitted Al Gore supporter, the author nonetheless touts, in the book's introduction, an ability to remain "objective and above partisanship" in examining the impact of Reagan. Perhaps naively, I hoped for the best and hoped the author could in fact step back, put personal bias on hold and bring new factual information to light.

From his use of language, to his expression of opinions represented as fact, to his choice and framing of anecdotes, this author pursues a revival of the well-worn liberal stereotype of Reagan as none-too-bright, lazy and all the rest. Particularly irksome in light of the author's avowed commitment to historical accuracy are opinions stated as givens with no basis in fact or supporting argument ("Even at its most entrepreneurial, American corporate capitalism had long since outgrown the simplified market-driven individualism that Reaganism posited as the essence of freedom." -- What?? Where's the proof for this one?).

As a side, I wouldn't have thought that an author espousing his ability to regard Reagan objectively would attempt in the process to pursue an agenda of resurrecting Jimmy Carter but this one gives it his best shot(for instance - much of what was, in fact, successful in the Reagan years had underpinnings in the Carter administration . . .).

In the interests of full disclosure, I'm on page 157 of this book and I'm all done. This thing may turn a corner, but I don't think so - I think I've got the gist of this one.

So, if you're looking for new information from newly declassified and released sources, and the like, I don't think this book's for you. If a warmed-over serving of a befuddled Ronald Reagan is your cup of tea, start reading.

6-5-08 update:

In looking to see how this book is faring, I'm treated to one of life's little amusements - a bunch of liberals in a dither over one of their own being outed. I scratch my head over liberals squirming so over being shown for what they really are - but thus seems to be the nature of the beast (although in the case of the author this phenomenon is a bit less perplexing - after all, admitting that his book is really just more of the "same old" might put a crimp on those pesky capitalistic sales . . .).

True to form, the liberals miss the point of the review, perhaps intentionally, perhaps not. The point is not that I'm an unabashed conservative, about which I make no bones. The point is that the author is an unabashed liberal attempting to travel incognito in the guise of "detached scholar". The point is that potential readers of this book, in deciding whether to spend time and money here, deserve to know what this book is really about, and that what it's really about isn't what the author represents it to be.

As an aside, again true to form, the liberals by and large don't dispute the content of the review (i.e. the liberal bias of the book). So, once again, par for the course, falling short on the merits, they go the "shoot the messenger" route ("ah ha gotcha - it's a conservative") in an attempt to discredit the review. Some things never change!





3 out of 5 stars Deeply flawed but certainly well-written history   June 21, 2008
 29 out of 35 found this review helpful

The extreme division among the reviewers of this book reflects a challenge Wilentz notes early on in The Age of Reagan: that it's very hard to write a recent history that anyone will consider objective in any way. His response has been to produce a book that, I think, will manage to disappoint readers on both sides of the political spectrum. Unlike most of the writing on the Reagan era so far-- which has been frankly hagiographic-- Wilentz pays attention to the scandals and missteps of the administration, including a lively portrayal of Iran-contra and a walkthrough of the S&L scandal. He mixes praise and critique in his portrayal of Reagan; later presidents, including the Bushes, do not fare as well. The reviews here make it clear how unwilling conservative readers are to revisit the S&L scandal years, or to confront the fate of Reaganomics... and yet liberal readers are unlikely to be completely comfortable with Wilentz's persistent focus on presidential politics and foreign policy as *the* defining elements of the age of Reagan. The fate of the poor, of women's programs, and of education under Reagan are not mentioned; some may join me in gaping at his description of the first Bush as an environmentalist who quickly stepped up after the Exxon Valdez incident (with the spill "cleaned up by mid-September"-- actually, Sean, the clean-up is still going on). Clinton's shenanigans with Monica rate dozens of pages; Anita Hill gets a paragraph. In other words, conservatives are unlikely to like everything this book includes, while liberals will probably be ruffled by what this book leaves out.

Beyond that, there are a couple of wider issues, centering around Wilentz's yen for sweeping statements. Certainly the statement that Reagan, "like many children of alcoholics, could not distinguish fact from fiction" made me yearn for a footnote... More importantly, instead of framing his argument as an examination of Reagan and his influence, he insists from the first sentence that the period from 1932 to 1970 was one of liberal reform (Joe McCarthy and Eisenhower would probably not agree) while 1974-present is one of conservative ascendency (despite the Clinton years, Bush's scrape-by win in 2000, etc.) Despite the liveliness of the writing, such sweeping statements really undermine this book, and raise questions about its suitability for, for example, a history classroom.

All that said, this book is well-written, and a quick read. If you have any opinion at all on the last four decades you'll probably find something in here to annoy you, but despite that I did enjoy revisiting the period with this author. Wilentz does help create a big picture of the era, and disagreeing with various of its elements, and arguing with his conclusions out loud as you read it, can be seen as entertaining or frustrating, depending on how seriously you want to take it.



2 out of 5 stars Biased to the point of little value   June 4, 2008
 21 out of 34 found this review helpful

I am a mid-30's male who voted for Gore in 2000 and was very disappointed with this book. I looked forward to reading it in hope of understanding how the rightward shift in American politics came to be. This book was advertised as such but is not: first, it is just a chronological history of the last 25 year than an analytical study of polticial themes and trends. Given the book is barely 450 pages, it is too short to offer any real insight or explanation. Secondly, the author, a well-known defender of Clinton [See the furor he caused recently claiming that Obama played the race card against Hillary or the recent article he wrote in Rolling Stone magazine about our GW Bush called "The worst President ever"] and that fact colours everything. The measure Professor Wilentz uses of a protagonist's worth is not Republican or Democrat but rather how close they are to Bill Clinton and their treatment of our former President. Al Gore receives the same treatment as G H Bush: Gore is scorned for not trying to emulate Clinton and not being a left-centrist like Bill Clinton. G H Bush is barely criticized because he was relatively moderate. The book claims to praise Reagan but I must have missed it: he gives some credit but really just reuses quotes, ignores economic policies [beyond using the term "regressive tax cuts[which they were]" over and over again] and focuses on Iran Contra. This book seems like something that Clinton's old policy group, the Democratic Leadership Council, would have written. It is not a very good history and is basically a biased defence of Bill Clinton and an attack on all who opposed him: Democrats and Republicans alike. Given the Professor's frequent praises of the 60's, Bob Dylan and other luminaries of that era such as Clinton, it appears he was unable to detach personal admiration and like from analysis. Poor book overall. Hopefully Perlstein's Nixonland is better.


1 out of 5 stars A Partisan History.   June 15, 2008
 18 out of 45 found this review helpful

I have never read a more partisan history. In the introduction, Wilentz equates intelligence with liberal thought. But, I imagined that was the simple self-congratulation of an academic. However, Wilentz really believes that. In Wilentz' world everything Republican is bad and everything Democrat is good, or at least not their fault.

Some highlights: When Chief Justice Rehnquist "growled 'Good Luck' at the swearing in," Hillary Clinton correctly surmised that Rehnquist had already unethically and unlawfully conspired to pervert justice in Clinton v. Jones. Bill Clinton was "obsessed" with Al Qaeda. FBI Director Louis Freeh was giving aid and comfort to the Republicans."

Check out this sentence in support of Wilentz' theory that the conservative Justices on the Bush v. Gore Supreme Court are the "most activist justices in our history": "And without question, partisanship could have operated, if only unconsciously, in the justices' thinking, though no doubt more so for some justices more than others." He doesn't tell us which justices were acting more unconsciously than the others, without question, no doubt, maybe. It was a 5-4 decision. If it had been 5-4 the other way, would that have still been an "activist" court? And seriously, Anthony Kennedy and Sandra Day O'Connor as partisan activists? They were notorious swing votes.

In Wilentz' world, Democrats who are acquitted are exonerated while Republicans who are acquitted remain "murky". Republicans "scurry". Like rats. Get it?

This book is not The Age of Reagan. It is, rather, Wilentz' brief based upon his admitted involvement in Bush v. Gore. It is as much, more really, Wilentz' belief that Bill Clinton made every governmental decision correctly.

Please understand: I am not anti-Clinton or pro-Bush. Far from it. But this is really bad history.


Powered by Associate-O-Matic

T-shirts, Posters

Pentagram T-shirts, bags, etc...


Gothic Posters


Antique Map Reproductions


Che Guevara shirts
and accessories


Terra Naturals - All Natural Products






© Darkpub.com 2001-2007. All rights reserved. Domain Registration and Hosting