Search Advanced SearchView Cart   Checkout   
 Location:  Home » body art - tattoo » Environmental Science » Cool It: The Skeptical Environmentalist's Guide to Global Warming  
Categories
music
h.r. giger
vampire: masquerade
esoterica
apparel
video
body art - tattoo
jewelry
HALLOWEEN
women's boots
men's boots
Info
about us
links
posters
Related Categories
• Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Science
Subcategories
All Titles
Arts & Photography
Biographies & Memoirs
Business & Investing
Children's Books
Computers & Internet
Cooking, Food & Wine
Engineering
Entertainment
Gay & Lesbian
General AAS
Home & Garden
Literature & Fiction
Medicine
Nonfiction
Outdoors & Nature
Parenting & Families
Professional
Reference
Religion & Spirituality
Science
Teens
Travel
Cool It: The Skeptical Environmentalist's Guide to Global Warming
Cool It: The Skeptical Environmentalist's Guide to Global Warming

zoom enlarge 
Author: Bjorn Lomborg
Publisher: Knopf
Category: Book

List Price: $21.00
Buy New: $10.75
You Save: $10.25 (49%)



New (35) Used (26) Collectible (2) from $9.99

Avg. Customer Rating: 4.0 out of 5 stars 91 reviews
Sales Rank: 7879

Media: Hardcover
Edition: 1
Number Of Items: 1
Pages: 272
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.8
Dimensions (in): 7.6 x 4.9 x 1.2

ISBN: 0307266923
Dewey Decimal Number: 363.73874
EAN: 9780307266927
ASIN: 0307266923

Publication Date: September 4, 2007
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days

Also Available In:

  • Kindle Edition - Cool It
  • Paperback - Cool It: The Skeptical Environmentalist's Guide to Global Warming (Vintage)

Similar Items:

  • The Skeptical Environmentalist: Measuring the Real State of the World
  • Unstoppable Global Warming: Every 1,500 Years, Updated and Expanded Edition
  • Climate Confusion: How Global Warming Hysteria Leads to Bad Science, Pandering Politicians and Misguided Policies that Hurt the Poor
  • Power to Save the World: The Truth About Nuclear Energy
  • The Deniers: The World Renowned Scientists Who Stood Up Against Global Warming Hysteria, Political Persecution, and Fraud**And those who are too fearful to do so

Editorial Reviews:

Amazon.com
Amazon.com Guest Reviewer: Michael Crichton
In his many science-themed bestsellers--including The Andromeda Strain, Jurassic Park, Prey, and most recently, Next--Michael Crichton has covered everything from genetically engineered dinosaurs to time travel to nantechnology run amok. Having cast his own views on the dangers and hysteria surrounding global warming with State of Fear, he turns his pen toward the often controversial Bjorn Lomborg and his latest book, Cool It: The Skeptical Environmentalist's Guide to Global Warming.




Bjorn Lomborg is the best-informed and most humane advocate for environmental change in the world today. In contrast to other figures that promote a single issue while ignoring others, Lomborg views the globe as a whole, studies all the problems we face, ranks them, and determines how best, and in what order, we should address them. His first book, The Skeptical Environmentalist, established the importance of a fact-based approach. With later books, Global Crises, Global Solutions and How to Spend $50 Billion to Make the World a Better Place, this mild-mannered Danish statistician has steadily gained new converts. Not surprisingly, Time Magazine named him one of the 100 most influential people in the world.

Cool It: The Skeptical Environmentalist's Guide to Global Warming will further enhance Lomborg's reputation for global analysis and thoughtful response. For anyone who wants an overview of the global warming debate from an objective source, this brief text is a perfect place to start. Lomborg is only interested in real problems, and he has no patience with media fear-mongering; he begins by dispatching the myth of the endangered polar bears, showing that this Disneyesque cartoon has no relevance to the real world where polar bear populations are in fact increasing. Lomborg considers the issue in detail, citing sources from Al Gore to the World Wildlife Fund, then demonstrating that polar bear populations have actually increased five fold since the 1960s.

Lomborg then works his way through the concerns we hear so much about: higher temperatures, heat deaths, species extinctions, the cost of cutting carbon, the technology to do it. Lomborg believes firmly in climate change--despite his critics, he's no denier--but his fact-based approach, grounded in economic analyses, leads him again and again to a different view. He reviews published estimates of the cost of climate change, and the cost of addressing it, and concludes that "we actually end up paying more for a partial solution than the cost of the entire problem. That is a bad deal."

In some of the most disturbing chapters, Lomborg recounts what leading climate figures have said about anyone who questions the orthodoxy, thus demonstrating the illiberal, antidemocratic tone of the current debate. Lomborg himself takes the larger view, explaining in detail why the tone of hysteria is inappropriate to addressing the problems we face.

In the end, Lomborg's concerns embrace the planet. He contrasts our concern for climate with other concerns such as HIV/AIDS, malnutrition, and providing clean water to the world. In the end, his ability to put climate in a global perspective is perhaps the book's greatest value. Lomborg and Cool It are our best guides to our shared environmental future.

--Michael Crichton

(photo credit: Jonathan Exley)




Product Description

A groundbreaking book that transforms the debate about global warming by offering a fresh perspective based on human needs as well as environmental concerns.

Bjorn Lomborg argues that many of the elaborate and expensive actions now being considered to stop global warming will cost hundreds of billions of dollars, are often based on emotional rather than strictly scientific assumptions, and may very well have little impact on the world’s temperature for hundreds of years. Rather than starting with the most radical procedures, Lomborg argues that we should first focus our resources on more immediate concerns, such as fighting malaria and HIV/AIDS and assuring and maintaining a safe, fresh water supply—which can be addressed at a fraction of the cost and save millions of lives within our lifetime. He asks why the debate over climate change has stifled rational dialogue and killed meaningful dissent.

Lomborg presents us with a second generation of thinking on global warming that believes panic is neither warranted nor a constructive place from which to deal with any of humanity’s problems, not just global warming. Cool It promises to be one of the most talked about and influential books of our time.




Customer Reviews:   Read 86 more reviews...

5 out of 5 stars Ignore Current Victims, Concentrate on Future Victims?   September 9, 2007
 212 out of 261 found this review helpful

All Bjorn is saying is that we're doing a heck of a job ignoring our current catastrophes. Anyone remember the Katrina victims? Anyone remember that AIDS hasn't been cured yet? You might want to just sit back, take a breath, and get your priorities in a row.

Before you go and save some lives from the year 2100, you might want to look around and save a few here in 2007. This is like people from 1907 trying to help us with breast cancer. No one knew what a gene was in 1907! I'm sure that the people of 2100 will have both the technology and the smarts to come up with something better than anything we could do.

But change IS happening. The ball is rolling. Things are becoming different. We are on a much better trajectory now than we were ten years ago, as far as cutting pollution is concerned. Nothing we do additionally is going to have much effect, so let's get our priorities straight and save our current victims, our homeless, our hungry, our crappy healthcare system. This is what Bjorn is saying.

The way the environmentalists are attacking Mr. Lomborg is appalling. "Methinks thou dost protest too much." The way they attack his character is like a dog protecting his bone. In this case the bone is a company that sells carbon offsets to the gullible, illiterate fans of eco-celebrities. Do you think Sheryl Crow is sitting at home reading the IPCC report? No, she's playing her guitar. She gets her global warming news from the same place that you do...Access Hollywood.

I'm sure that every negative reviewer here has not even read the book. This is obvious because your arguments for global warming being real are his same arguments! He's not saying it's not happening, he's saying that it's not as horrible as people are being led to believe and that we may have a few years to nip it in the bud, but not by throwing money at various environmental firms. We need to find the companies that are going to get the job done right, and right now it is not Joe Bob's Carbon Offset Emporium at PO Box 119, Santa Barbara, California.

There are too many fishy environmental companies popping up all over the place, so be wary of where your carbon offsets are going. Better yet, let the free marketplace get the technology up to speed while you send your money to AIDS research and building new homes. That's where you can really do some good.

And as far as Michael Crichton is concerned, he might be a novelist, but he's also a brilliant intellect that knows how to read scientific journals. The only thing he doesn't have is an agenda. Crichton is not covered in oil money. He's not trying to sell you anything but novels. Al Gore co-owns a carbon offset firm and an environmental consultancy firm. This is like a cat salesman trying to convince you that you've got a rat infestation. The environmentalists fear that this is their last big chance to have all of their wishes come true, so they're fighting hard to keep you scared. Don't be afraid. Everything will be okay. The only rats that you have are the ones at your door trying to sell you cats.



5 out of 5 stars He makes sense   September 4, 2007
 186 out of 242 found this review helpful

In COOL IT; Dr Lomborg, again, hits the nail on the head. One of the few scientists in the world who is willing to buck the popular and political trend, Dr Lomborg looks at a lot of data and then draws a scientific conclusion. It is amazing how many of those who disagree with Dr Lomborg are trying to stifle his and other's similar comments. Where is the debate? His research and abundant footnotes allow anyone to look up and analyze the data for themselves. (When did we lose the ability to debate - respectfully - both sides of an issue?) Dr Lomborg has abundant research on his side and is simply summarizing that data in an objective fashion. He suggests that there are other more pressing needs on the planet that - if attended to - could save millions of lives rather than chasing the illusive dream of global warming with limited payoff. 5-stars for an important book that deserves to be heard in the debate over global warming.


5 out of 5 stars Finally, a rational view on Global Warming   September 6, 2007
 138 out of 182 found this review helpful

There are two great things that Lomborg does:

First, he looks at all of the issues in the Global milieu and argues that a single minded focus on Global Warming is detrimental to maximizing the overall welfare of humans on earth. He points out in great detail, that the value of fighting AIDS/HIV and Malaria and improving access to safe water greatly exceeds implementing the Kyoto accord, which will have a minimal impact on Global Warming. His book is intelligent, insightful and dead bang on.

Second, he actually points out that good things will happen from Global Warming (GASP!). Think about it, when have you heard someone do that? At the height of our paranoia as humans, we equate any change with all bad. Such is the case with most people concerning Global Warming. But is this rational? Of course not, change can bring good and bad. The question is what is the result on balance?

As examples, deaths due to weather will decrease overall. Heat related deaths will increase, but cold related deaths will decrease and cold related deaths account for about 80% of weather related deaths. Overall availability of quality water will increase because precipitation levels will increase. Antarctica will actually get larger (i.e.; have a deeper, higher ice field), not shrink as implied by Al Gore in his movie. But this is only a partial list, there will, indeed, be many benefits from Global Warming which dramatically change the equation from "This-could-be-the-end-of-the-earth" type rhetoric to "This is one of many serious problems that needs to be balanced against the other problems of Earth."

So thank you Mr. Lomborg. A rational mind is finally writing, speaking and talking about Global Warming.



3 out of 5 stars Reasonable? Possibly. Perfect? Hardly.   September 10, 2007
 87 out of 120 found this review helpful

Since this review is neither sycophantic nor a hatchet job, I should add the disclaimer that I am neither a Christian conservative nor a green liberal. I am in favor of reason and science, and opposed to faith in all forms--including the environmentalist movement.

It's interesting that every reviewer thus far gives this book either the highest or lowest possible rating. This fact points to the book's most serious flaw. Global warming has become a purely political, partisan issue, and while Lomborg is clearly trying to play "moderate," he's fooling neither his conservative admirers nor his liberal detractors.

More broadly, this illustrates the principle that science and government don't mix. This is the brilliant formula that gave the world Lysenkoism. So while we certainly can't take the IPCC data--or more precisely, the media's interpretations of it--at face value (even though Lomborg's own case that man-made global warming exists rests entirely on this), neither can we trust any popular media on the subject either way--Lomborg included. But he certainly seems more reasonable than the scaremongers.

Those who are truly concerned with this issue are going to have to do some real work to dig up the actual science and critically analyze it themselves, and the greatest virtue of Lomborg's book is that it points out the kinds of questions that need to be asked, which is sadly something that very few people are doing.

As for Lomborg's views on other issues such as poverty, hunger, etc., they are rather conventional.



1 out of 5 stars Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics?   September 6, 2007
 56 out of 175 found this review helpful

This work is quite frustrating as is Lomborg writ large.

He is eloquent and a good writer. He can make legitimate points about environmentalists making mistakes in arguments (such as associating specific weather events with Global Warming). And, he points to the importance of making rational decisions as to how to invest best (by definition) limited resources.

Yet, sadly, he simply misrepresents too much evidence and is too misleading.

For example,

* Re Hurricanes & Global Warming: While Lomborg makes a legitimate point about how people mistakenly link a specific hurricane (or any weather event) and Global Warming, he misleads in his citation of a World Meteorological Organization 2006 statement. This statement has ten points and Lomborg only cites/discusses the three that support his preconceived notions and does not let readers know that he is selectively citing. Reading the statement in full, in essence, contradicts Lomborg with its outlining of ways global warming will worsen hurricane impacts. Here are two "consensus" points Lomborg omits: "It is likely that some increase in tropical cyclone peak wind-speed and rainfall will occur if the climate continues to warm. Model studies and theory project a 3-5% increase in wind-speed per degree Celsius increase of tropical sea surface temperatures"; and "If the projected rise in sea level due to global warming occurs, then the vulnerability to tropical cyclone storm surge flooding would increase." Hmmm ... another reviewer praised Lomborg and stated that "abundant research [is] on his side and [he] is simply summaring that data in an objective fashion". I don't think so ...

* Lomborg inaccurately argues that CO2 emission reduction is costly. He overstates the cost of energy efficiency (think Amory Lovins/RMI and Negawatts) and does not adequately discussion total costs of energy (all that free riding of pollution due to "external costs" of burning fossil fuels). Lomborg does not include in costs restrictions on eating tuna due to mercury pollution from coal-fired electricity.

Sadly, Lomborg distorts in this work that moves it from a valuable read into something that only experts (who can see the distortions) should read because the distortions will mislead rather than enlighten.



Powered by Associate-O-Matic

T-shirts, Posters

Pentagram T-shirts, bags, etc...


Gothic Posters


Antique Map Reproductions


Che Guevara shirts
and accessories


Terra Naturals - All Natural Products






© Darkpub.com 2001-2007. All rights reserved. Domain Registration and Hosting