This book gets an incredible number of word-of-mouth recommendations from within the dog world, and for good reason. It's also somewhat exasperating, also for good reason. An updated edition might turn into a sort of Dr. Spock guide for dogs; as it is, even for its few blemishes, if you're interested in training at all -- you have a dog, you should be interested -- you need to read this one.

The book is basically an engagingly-written set of essays on positive-reinforcement, operant-conditioning dog training. (In a nutshell, that means concentrating on setting a dog up to succeed, and then on rewarding it when it does succeed, rather than on punishing the dog for mistakes.) Culture Clash does two things: it gives you a broad sense of why positive reinforcement techniques work, and it really, REALLY lays into old-style, aversive, leash-jerking training methods. The reason it gets recommended so much is that it's GREAT for people who have only a vague idea of how to train a dog based on what they see others doing, and who might end up with a miserable dog and a sore arm from tugging at a choke collar. Donaldson does a truly excellent job of showing you how and why positive reinforcement will help you communicate with your dog. She does a great job showing you how happy that can feel, and showing you the broad outline of how it works.

What she DOESN'T do especially well in this book is give you a specific, basic training regimen for your dog. That's where my editing objection comes in.

As I said, the chapters in this book are almost more like stand-alone essays. They don't really flow into one another as well as you might expect. Other, how-to training guides will structure themselves around common issues -- a chapter about housetraining, or sections based on a puppy's age or something. Culture Clash doesn't do that. It reads more like Jean Donaldson -- a lively, agile writer whose style and sense of humor is a delight to read -- sat down and decided to write a set of thematic articles, and like those got packaged together in the form of the book. Each essay is trying to do both the book's jobs at the same time, so we're talking about treats and clickers AND ripping into the "Bad Dog" school of thought simultaneously. That means the level of detail in the text varies pretty dramatically from page to page. So, for example, you'll be reading about how to train a "down stay" or something, and suddenly Ms. Donaldson is skewering leash-jerking in a long aside. She delivers her barbs with obvious relish and skill, she's a heck of a writer, but when you're reading to pick up practical tips, that's a somewhat frustrating style to work through.

So, the chapters in Culture Clash are this sort of mishmash of different material, but it's well-written and you enjoyed reading it through. Now, you remember some clever idea about how to train that "down stay" that Rex just can't "get." You turn to the index... and there isn't one. The single easiest thing the publisher of this book NEEDS to do is include a thorough index. Argh! Frustration!

The other irony, of course, is that the book doesn't use positive reinforcement on the reader all that well. When Donaldson goes after the leash-jerkers, or talks about ear pinching at obedience schools, she's saying "BAD DOG" to the old school of dog obedience in about as loud a voice as anyone can write in. You can see why a few people take this book as a sort of personal affront. She sure isn't luring THEM along, she's just plain scolding...

If you're already sold on the idea of a rewards-based training regimen for your dog, I still think you'll get a lot out of this book. You might want to avoid dealing with a lot of the hard-hitting criticism, though, and choose a simpler how-to guide. "The Power of Positive Dog Training" by Ms. Donaldson and Pat Miller, is a more practical guide than Culture Clash. It gives you a specific, six-week training regimen. Also, Karen Pryor would be a good author for you; she has a great puppy book, and a nice little book-with-two-clickers-and-some-treats kit that sells in pet stores. Pryor spends almost no time on dissing the "bad trainers," she's all about the positives.

(If you've got kids, you may want to go with something a little more accessible for them; there are guides specifically written for the whole family that way, but you should probably judge those by age by seeing them in a store.)


Good information, bad organization, worse attitude.   March 6, 2002
 206 out of 263 found this review helpful

I completely agree with Ms. Donaldson's central premise; that we create unnecessary frustration (both human and canine) when we act on the mistaken notion that dogs possess human-level understanding of abstract concepts, human motivations and human desires. She presents excellent techniques designed to short-circuit the escalating frustrations that result from our tendency to anthropomorphize our dogs.

That said, I do not like this book.

Culture Clash has a minimalist table of contents and NO INDEX, which makes it nearly impossible to find passages on a specific topic. This renders the book nearly useless as a training resource or reference work.

One could still read it cover to cover and glean much useful information in the process, but this would require enduring the vitriol that seems to drip from every page. The story I made up about Ms. Donaldson while reading Culture Clash is that she has been nursing some long-standing personal grudges against specific people in her professional field and that she wrote this book as much to ridicule them and settle old scores as to impart useful information to dog-owners.

Ms. Donaldson seems unsatisfied with simply pointing out the faulty notions about dog behavior that are the currency of contemporary "common sense" thinking about dogs. It seemed to me as I read the book that she considers no myth properly debunked until she has cast one of her "rivals" as the personification of that belief and then heaped ridicule on that person. The following passage seems typical:

"I once spoke to a traditional trainer who poured scorn on the use of food as a motivator. The line he trotted out, which still makes me wretch even to this day, was "if you use food to train, the dog is doing it for the food and not for you. (...) If you opt to not use positive reinforcement, you end up, like they all do, using aversives and announcing that your dog is doing it for you. Pathetic."

If you think you would enjoy wading through 224 pages of this sort of thing, then Culture Clash may be the dog-training book for you. I'd still like to finish the book, but Ms. Donaldson's tone starts to wear on my nerves very quickly, so I take it in very small chunks.


A foolish book filled with misleading horsehockey   November 1, 1999
 153 out of 215 found this review helpful

I am a dog trainer who specializes in individual consultation for behavior problems. I first became aware of this book from clients who had followed Dondaldson's methods and couldn't understand why their dogs were so uncontrollable, didn't respect them, and in several cases were becoming aggressive. I've made a lot of money "fixing" these dogs and retraining their owners, but I'd just as soon not.

Donaldson wants to be a behaviorist, but selectively -- dogs are dumb and learn via Skinnerian and Pavlovian conditioning, humans are smart and learn via insight and reason. Sorry, no cookie, Jean -- Skinner would be the first to tell you that. She sets up a straw man -- anthropomorphism/abusive training -- against her brand of operant conditioning, and ignores the work of ethologists and ethological trainers.

When Donaldson doesn't like some insight into canine nature, or a training technique that has been proven to work, she simply dismisses it as "stupid" -- no argument or justification. She appears to have great contempt for the native intelligence of both dogs and their owners (her readers).

The few good ideas that Donaldson includes are old saws of dog training, but she never acknowledges this fact.

Donaldson's approach to training is a fad at the moment. Readers seeking to live with a civilized dog would be better served by writers such as Carol Benjamin, The Monks of New Skete, Brian Kilcommons and Job Evans. Readers who just want to know how a dog "works" (ethology) should look at works by Roger Abrantes, Konrad Lorenz, and Michael Fox.


Never be ashamed of your Halti & your Clicker again.   June 22, 1998
 104 out of 111 found this review helpful

I have read many dog training books in the past 6 months, but this is the only one that really rang true for me. Jean Donaldson articulates what many dog owners have felt for some time: that yanking, yelling and regimentation do NOT constitute positive training methods. She rightly calls slip-collars and choke chains "strangulation collars," and makes it clear that the "leash correction" is simply a punishment -- and not a very effective one at that. Her whole training ethos is based on the premise that dogs are dogs, not people. That may sound pretty obvious, but it doesn't seem to be, at least not to traditional dog trainers. If you have a dog that likes to be a dog (interacts with both humans and dogs in the same manner, and doesn't like to be restrained in any way) Donaldson's training methods will save your sanity -- and perhaps your dog's life. This book is more than a manual, however, as it fully explains the theory before detailing the methods. Along the way, it provides a good read and some great laughs. This is also the first book I've read that describes some fun and effective training games to play with your dog, rather than just saying "play with your dog." It's not all fun and games though: I dare you to read the section called "Empathy 101" and remain unmoved toward the plight of the average family dog. My only (minor) complaint about "Culture Clash" is that it needs either a more detailed Table of Contents, an Index, or both. That said, however, I urge you to buy this book, and leave the traditional methods of dog training back in WWII, where they began, and where they belong!


Training from the dog's point of view   June 7, 2000
 87 out of 89 found this review helpful

I was originally turned off by the beginning of this book. The author's ideas about dogs having no "desire to please" their owners was so contrary to everything that is considered basic about dog training and dog behavior that I didn't believe it to be true. However, she thoroughly backed up her ideas and completely clarified the difference between "desire to please" as we see it and "desire to get treats or attention" as the dog sees it.

It's difficult to get beyond the "Disney" approach to dogs as she calls it, the way society and Hollywood have taught us dogs should behave, but the book opened my eyes to what sort of relationship dogs really have with people.

The book takes dog training from a dog's point of view - and that is the best way to get results. The empathy for the dog's position that the author encourages was a completely new experience for me. I adopted an adult dog from a shelter four months ago who had never been indoors before. She had been abused and you could hardly say "no" to her without her cringing and running away. I needed a training method that was completely positive and non-abusive in every sense of the word. More importantly, I needed a training method that worked.

My dog can sit, down, stay, come, wait, drop, and fetch; she doesn't jump up, she doesn't chase the cats, and she's housebroken - all thanks to this book.

The author thoroughly takes you through the way dogs learn with specific examples and exercises. It's hard not to get excited about teaching your dog after learning so completely how to teach!

I highly recommend this book to new dog owners and to people looking to improve their relationship with their pets. Getting rid of unrealistic expectations makes all the difference in understanding and relating to your dog.