|
| Cop in the Hood: My Year Policing Baltimore's Eastern District | 
 enlarge | Author: Peter Moskos
Publisher: Princeton University Press
Category: Book
List Price: $24.95
Buy New: $12.25
You Save: $12.70 (51%)
New (19) Used (4) Collectible (1) from $12.25
Avg. Customer Rating:  7 reviews
Sales Rank: 16276
Media: Hardcover
Edition: Revised
Number Of Items: 1
Pages: 245
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.9
Dimensions (in): 8.5 x 5.7 x 1
ISBN: 0691140081
Dewey Decimal Number: 363.2092
EAN: 9780691140087
ASIN: 0691140081
Publication Date: June 22, 2008
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
|
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
Cop in the Hood is an explosive insider's story of what it is really like to be a police officer on the front lines of the war on drugs. Harvard-trained sociologist Peter Moskos became a cop in Baltimore's roughest neighborhood--the Eastern District, also the location for the first season of the critically acclaimed HBO drama The Wire--where he experienced real-life poverty and violent crime firsthand. This revised and corrected edition of Cop in the Hood provides an unforgettable window into the world that outsiders never see--the thriving drug corners, the nerve-rattling patrols, and the heartbreaking failure of 911. Moskos reveals the truth about the drug war and why it is engineered to fail--a truth he learned on the midnight shift. He describes police academy graduates fully unprepared for the realities of the street. He tells of a criminal justice system that incarcerates poor black men on a mass scale--a self-defeating system that measures success by arrest quotas and fosters a street code at odds with the rest of society--and argues for drug legalization as the only realistic way to end drug violence and let cops once again protect and serve. Moskos shows how officers in the ghetto are less concerned with those policed than with self-preservation and maximizing overtime pay--yet how any one of them would give their life for a fellow officer. Cop in the Hood ventures deep behind the Thin Blue Line to disclose the inner workings of law enforcement in America's inner cities. Those who read it will never view the badge the same way again.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 2 more reviews...
 An exciting page-turner April 20, 2008
5 out of 6 found this review helpful
Being the author's brother, I am probably not 100% neutral. Family obligations, however, only require that I am generally positive about the book to his face. They don't mean I have to gush or write a review.
This review is because the book is snappy, well written and fun to read. It manages to be smart with being too academic. It delivers on that exciting and real Wire feel that the dust cover promises.
Cop in the Hood documents the problems of the ghetto and the failures in the war on drugs from a police perspective. Although pro-police, it documents institutional failings from the ridiculous police academy to bureaucracy that encourages pointless arrests which are unable to be processed by the DA or the courts.
It talks disturbingly about million dollar blocks, where the taxpayers pay that amount of money each year to incarcerate that block's sentenced residents (30), mostly for non violent drug offenses. Would it cut crime if we put that million back in preventative policing that block? As the author observes, "We could find out."
I was relieved to learn the author observed no real police corruption. I was not so relieved to see how much money and effort goes into our unsuccessful drug prohibition which criminalizes so many (poor) people, and brings much violence to many (poor) neighborhoods.
Luckily as a middle class person, I don't need to purchase my drugs on the street. But for those not in my privileged situation, this book is more than just enjoyable reading; it is important.
 Decent Effort, But Missing a Few Beats June 20, 2008
5 out of 7 found this review helpful
Moskos' book recounts his 14 months on the beat and his training as a Baltimore city police officer. The book is an abridged version of his doctoral dissertation. Turning a dissertation into popular reading is difficult and the book falls down in a number of places. A long history of Prohibition suddenly turns up at the end and is only partially well woven into the text. There are other drifts into facts and figures, as well, and the effect tends to be more didactic than illuminating. For example, there is a needless listing of arrest statistics for Moskos and his colleagues, where a sentence or two about the range of arrest records would have sufficed. Like many ethnographies, some of the most interesting details are in the footnotes (actually, endnotes here), often told more concisely and succinctly written than much of the main text. There also are longitudinal survey data that don't get discussed at all until the endnotes and would seem to have materially affected Moskos' relationship with other officers. He tends to minimize the impact of writing a book on his relationships and observations, beyond his introduction to the force and one wonders how well he actually monitored all of that. In addition, very routine, often difficult aspects of policing such as domestic violence (mentioned in passing) and dealing with the mentally ill (no mention at all) get little coverage here.
Despite the detail, the book really fails to get at a certain level of depth in terms of the relationships among cops and the motivations to join and remain on the force. Indeed, some interesting information on racial and gender differences in motivation to join the force turn up in the endnotes and apparently will be part of another publication. Moskos pulls punches a bit with regard to the conduct of his fellow officers. His father (noted military sociologist Charles Moskos) has been criticized for taking many aspects of the military's "color blindness" and meritocracy at face value. Moskos seems to do the same early on in his book with respect to the presence of corruption and other misconduct, yet the endnotes indicate that 10% of his class left the police because of their conduct, a remarkable percentage in a field where it is difficult to fire people with a certain level of tenure. Later on in the book, Moskos does talk about people who seem to have limited motivation or other problems in the job and intimates at excessive uses of force. Because this kind of material is not well developed, it becomes difficult to see the context where misconduct or poor performance occur and the motivations of the people involved. The web of relationships among the officers and the sense of Moskos' colleagues as people could have been better developed with more attention to case studies. He may have wished to protect identities, and avoided this, although other information, like arrest records would seem to offer thin protection of confidentiality. Compared with classic, intimate ethnographic portraits like "Street Corner Society" or "The Urban Villagers", the book falls short, particularly in relation to Whyte's appreciation of everyday language or Gans' ability to go back and forth between jargon and everyday life.
Moskos lays out a number of policy proposals, but they seem a bit naive, particularly in terms of how they would be introduced, implemented and monitored. The orientation of law enforcement and the culture that reinforces it are well developed in the book, but their impediments to change are not well considered. Similarly, comparisons with the Netherlands fail to take into account differences in culture, social structure, etc. that would affect adaptation to the US.
If readers are concerned that I'm a little harsher than earlier reviewers, a few considerations are in order: I'm not his brother; I've done qualitative research; I have known police officers, personally, at a number of points in my life; and previously had some involvement in the evaluation of prospective police cadets. Like Moskos, I also took time off from my studies and worked in a sometimes dangerous field where I occasionally had contact with police---in my case working in psychiatric hospitals, which gave me an irreplaceable education. The psychiatric field has no end of ethnographic and journalistic accounts of varying quality, as well as fiction based on fact like "One Flew Over the Cukoo's Nest". I ca appreciate academic aspects of the book, as well as its popular appeal and the bridges between the two. Moskos' book will inform those who haven't had much to do with police, but are curious. Unfortunately, this will require some plowing through tedious detail, and some people may not make it all the way through. On the other hand, a reading of a good journalistic account of police work such as David Simon's "Homicide" (also taking place in Baltimore), might be more enjoyable.
Decent, But Not Very Engaging June 27, 2008
5 out of 6 found this review helpful
Despite the terrible cover (even by academic press standards), this looked right up my alley for a number of reasons: (1) a good friend just moved to Baltimore and I've been trying to read more about the city, (2) I know mainstream Baltimore pretty well and was interested in learning about a part of the city I've never ventured into, (3) I've been a big fan of The Wire since season one, and wanted to see how closely reality coincided with that drama, and (4) I've been on a bit of a "academic as participant/observer" reading binge lately, including books like Brothel, Rolling Nowhere, and Gang Leader for a Day, and wanted to compliment those with a inside look at policework.
Like those three books, this one was born from academic roots, as Moskos was scouting around for a project for his PhD dissertation. After approaching and being rejected by several city police forces, the Baltimore PD accepted his proposal to work as a cop for a year with the knowledge he would write about his experience. So, the good news is that his account of policing starts from day one at the academy and proceeds unbroken for twenty months, which is a marked contrast to some of the books mentioned above, in which the authors dip in and out of the culture/life they are exploring. The bad news is that everyone Moskos served with knew he was writing a book. The problem of observation influencing behavior is well-established in documentary film and ethnography, and Moskos seems to underplay it's effects a bit too much.
Some more good news is that Moskos is meticulous is outlining both the psychology and procedure of being a patrol officer. As a city employee myself, it didn't surprise me (though it did depress me), the extent to which urban policework is hindered by bureaucracy and administrative fiat. The overreliance on patrolling from cars, the strict adherence to the policy of immediate response to any call for service (311 or 911 call), the avalanche of paperwork generated by any officer activity, all of these contribute to a environment that lends itself to officers "gaming the system" for their own comfort and/or financial benefit. While I love this kind of insider procedural detail and the explanations of the mentality it engenders, the book suffers from being a good deal too dry.
To a certain extent, this reflects the reality of most policework, which is boring and laden with paperwork. However, the books I mentioned are all engaging precisely because their authors do a great job of making characters out of themselves an the subjects of their study, and that just doesn't happen here. Moskos never lets us get to know his fellow officers or much of himself, and without that personal connection, it ends up reading like a long social policy paper (or a revised dissertation, which it i). The ultimate policy conclusion of the book is not a shocking one, but for those interested in the "war on drugs" it's certainly worth reading, as it is capably outlined and grounded in Moskos' personal fieldwork. Basically, Moskos argues that the war on drugs is a total disaster from a policing perspective, creating a huge drain on resources that could be more effectively directed at other social problems. He believes that the country has yet to learn the lesson easily drawn from the history of alcohol prohibition (which he goes into in rather digressive length and detail), which is that making things illicit merely removes it from government control (and taxation), without reducing demand.
While I'm personally more or less on board with this conclusion and am heartened to see it supported up by Moskos' day-to-day patrolman experiences, it's not really what I came to read about. The book will tell you very little at all about Baltimore (perhaps because Moskos is not from there), and beyond spelling out some of street-level mechanics of the drug trade, there's not much here about East Baltimore you couldn't have gleaned from The Wire and/or The Corner. To a certain extent, one has to feel a little bad for Moskos, since that show kind of steals his thunder. Which bring up another point, his service was about seven years ago, and one has to wonder to what extent things have changed since then, if 9/11 has had an impact on policing, or the increased use of computers, for example.
In any event, while it's certainly readable (aside from numerous typos), it never really engages, and that's why I ultimately found it somewhat disappointing. I would highly highly recommend it to anyone thinking about becoming a city cop, and it' also probably worth reading if you're into criminology, ethnography, and drug policy -- otherwise it's probably of limited interest.
Important Book April 19, 2008
3 out of 3 found this review helpful
I don't know how I can improve on the excellent and well deserved editorial reviews. They are true.
If you liked HBO's The Wire, then this is a must read. This is a rare look at police work from a thoughtful and intelligent participant/observer. Top down analysis gets nowhere in this subject. We will forgive Peter for being a sociologist, since he came close to going native in Baltimore.
It reminds me a little of Jane Jacobs 'Death and Life of Great American Cities' in the sense that an open mind and careful observation can get you to insights that aren't either obvious or trivial.
I also fully agree with his thoughts regarding the war on drugs. First, anytime you call something 'War' as a metaphor, you have taken the first step down a dangerous path. Just start with The War on Poverty and keep counting through The War on Terror and it isn't pretty. America does fine with existential wars against nation states, like WWII.
Anything that can be done by criminalizing essentially personal behaviors like drug use, has been done to America's inner cities. But enough ranting and once more note that Peter's observations are frequently counter intuitive, and there are a number of little tips that may be of practical use (911? think again).
Maybe this generation of academic based thinkers can help us get beyond the rhetoric and come up with workable, strategic, and effective policies that will make our cities better places to live.
Cop in the Hood is excellent April 23, 2008
3 out of 4 found this review helpful
Anyone who loved The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference and Freakonomics [Revised and Expanded]: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything will love this intrinsic look into Baltimore policing as a microcosm for the war on drugs. Moskos shows the inner working of a system so many of us have preconceived notions about. Is it racist? Turns out it isn't. Is it working? No. Is it the cop's fault? Not the ones that are on the street.
Moskos mixes lyrics by rapper Ice T, quotes by Al Capone and police statistics immaculately. The writing about middle of the night encounters with dealers, junkies and gang members is amazingly detailed, and constantly put me in his position as a rookie cop on the dangerous East Baltimore streets. What would I do if I were in his position? I would be afraid. Very afraid.
The day to day life (or night to night life in Moskos' case) is filled with such encounters many of them having very humane and sometimes humorous resolutions. In one case Moskos is dealing with a domestic assault where none of the other cops wanted to get into the house because it smelled so bad. Moskos confronted the woman:
"Why is it so stinky?" I asked the woman.
"He don't bathe. Not in a year."
"Why not?"
"He lazy."
"That's pretty lazy," I said, "because once you get in the tub, bathing kind of takes care of itself."
(In this case Moskos didn't get him to bathe)
The book is filled with simple and realistic "tipping point" ideas on how to improve the current system from within while using Prohibition and the successful Dutch non-war on drugs as examples of a greater historical context without ever being preachy. Cop in the Hood is a must read, not just for non-fiction lovers and avid viewers of HBO's The Wire - The Complete First Season, but, truly, for everyone who ever wondered about this thing called the war on drugs.
|
|
|
Powered by Associate-O-Matic
| |
