I'm not sure what finally happened to it, but at any rate I've just recently gotten around to replacing it. And the story is still as great a read as it was when it was new. I can't claim to have read everything Clarke ever wrote, but this is certainly the best of his works that I _have_ read.

Other reviewers have pointed out, entirely correctly, that this isn't a book to read for character development. That's true of Clarke's books in general, I think, but it's especially apt here, where the 'star' of the book is an artifact of an alien civilization. In fact, even the 'star' doesn't get a lot of development, since in the end it remains deeply mysterious. (I don't know what happens in the sequels; I haven't read them and I haven't heard good things about them. I'm treating this as a standalone work.)

But man, if you want to read a gripping, haunting story about the first human exploration of a space probe (or something) from an extraterrestrial civilization -- and if you want to watch the exploration process unfold and feel as though you're participating in the discovery yourself -- then this is a book for you. This is what Clarke does best: when you read a story through his eyes, you're looking outward at the objects of scientific investigation, and helping yourself to a chunk of the intellectual wonder and joy that goes with such investigation.

The excitement here is the excitement of hard science, not of character development. If that's what you want, you'll probably love this book.


No region on Earth left for safe celestial target practice   July 28, 2008
 24 out of 26 found this review helpful

First of all: thanks to the Scandinavian parts of Texas for pointing me to A.Clarke, whom I had previously known only on a 'no name basis' as the writer of 2001 Space Odyssey. I have high respect and liking for the SF genre, but not much knowledge of it, apart from one or the other Verne, Wells, Samjatin, Huxley, Orwell, Bradbury, Asimov, Lem... Of course not counting Douglas Adams, who played another ball game, didn't he?
Rama is a worth while experience. Good Science Fiction is usually also about 'science', but if it is good, it is much about society, about history, usually in the future. The evil cliche term of the paradigm comes to practical use when you read good SF. (The word was invented by evil consultants who needed excuses for the havoc they caused.) SF is about changing paradigms. There is lots of that going on here.
In the 22nd century, the United Planets, which seem to be essentially Earth, Mercury and Mars (which are Earthling colonies) plus some moons are confronted with a scary phenomenon: a huge artificial space body travelling with high speed near the Earth. Luckily the initially silly Star Wars technology had later been developed to the advantage of peaceful purposes and helps arranging a 'rendezvous' with the alien craft, named Rama because the Roman and Greek mythologies have been exhausted in the process of naming space. The process of exploring the strange space body and of thinking through its implications is the actual plot.
Go for it!


The greatest mystery   April 18, 2008
 20 out of 22 found this review helpful

Briefly; a very large cylinder appears in our solar system and an expedition is sent out to investigate what obviously is an extraterrestrial object. They are able to enter the cylinder and watch it slowly "wake up" from the inside. The alien technology they encounter is highly advanced and awe inspiring but still possible to understand.

The story develops in a fairly slow pace, but it is full of suspense and mystery. The discoveries that the astronauts make are so fantastic and described with such lucid imagination that all I could feel while reading this book was anticipation and awe. Furthermore, the more the astronauts explore and discover the deeper the mysteries seem to grow. One thing I really like about Arthur C. Clarke is that his descriptions are scientifically plausible and still very imaginative. I highly recommend this Sci-Fi novel.

Arthur C. Clarke is my favorite Science Fiction author and Rendezvous with Rama is one of my favorites. It was a collection of short stories that included my all time favorite short story "The wall of darkness" that originally got me hooked on Arthur C. Clarke (review coming). Arthur C. Clarke will never be forgotten.



Arthur C Clarke, national treasure!   October 28, 2002
 16 out of 21 found this review helpful

As someone who considers herself a fan of "soft" science fiction (you know, the stuff you don't have to have an engineering degree or a clue about math to follow)I could only shake my head in wonderment when I was finished with Rendezvous with Rama. How does Clarke do it?

Here is a tale of mankind's first encounter with an alien spacecraft coming into our own solar system -- set in the not too distant future when we could conceivably have colonized our own local planets, but not yet explored the galaxy. The sense of awe, of discovery both delightful and terrifying comes across sharply as we follow a team that sets out to enter and explore the seemingly uninhabited interior of this gigantic environment. All the while events are unfolding in response to Rama's nearing the sun, the author manages to explain the scientific logistics of Rama in terms a lay person like me can clearly understand without being patronizing and without detracting from the characters and their story (which are, true to Clarke's tradition, interesting without being melodramatic).

I was reluctant to undertake this book at first, having received the impression that it was too technical and therefore, boring. It was neither. Now I can't wait to continue the series.


Making sense of the unknown   August 3, 2006
 12 out of 13 found this review helpful

An unidentified space vessel ("Rama") enters the solar system. The human species has no other option than to try and figure out what it means. That is the basic datum around which Arthur C. Clarke's celebrated novel has been constructed. Clarke opens four windows on this process of sense making: an aesthetic, a scientific, a political and a religious.

The aesthetic dimension of the encounter with Rama is, for me, the most compelling. Rama exhibits a minimalistic but refined architecture based on a threefold symmetry. It is truly a thing of beauty and a pleasure to behold for one's mind's eye. On top of that comes the awe-inspiring vastness of this contraption and the author is very skillful in evoking the frisson that goes with the feeling of desorientation when navigating through this enormous space (a very good example of what in Kantian aesthetics would be called an experience of the negative sublime).

Rama presents us also with a scientific puzzle. As the story progresses, we understand that it is a kind of ark, or repository of an alien culture's artefacts and life forms. It does this by relying on a clever combination of thermodynamical and biological principles - the elegance of which reinforces the beauty of the ship's architecture. However, as there is much which remains unfathomable to its human explorers, the story strikes a good balance between the anthropically accessible and the fundamentally mysterious. At the end of the book, just before the human visitors leave Rama, their desire to know overcomes their infatuation with the ship's tantalising beauty and they puncture its smooth inner skin to inspect some of the cargo. The ship doesn't seem to mind but to the reader the moment has a weight similar to Eve eating the apple in the Garden of Eden.

The cleverness and elegance of the scientific and aesthetic perspectives contrast heavily with the one-dimensionality of the political and religious outlook on Rama. For the religiously minded, the arrival of the space ship constitutes an act of grace. It has come to rescue mankind from its fallen state. For politicians, Rama constitutes a threat to the power equilibrium in the solar system. Hence, it needs to be destroyed. Clearly, this constitutes a dilemma which is, however, neatly resolved by Rama leaving the solar system for some unknown destination. One wonders how deep the wedge would have entered into human civilisation if the dilemma would have persisted for a longer while.

What is missing from Clarke's narrative is a deeply philosophical perspective. The questions and tensions remain at the level of the self-centerdly functional and never transcend the "us" versus "it" perspective as exemplified by questions such as: what does Rama mean? How might we make use of it? What could it do to us? Nowhere this leads us to question the deeper purpose of mankind, to re-appreciate our position in a universe which brings forth incomprehensible felicities (and threats) and sustains life in a most surprising way. Clarke could have asked those questions without letting the story slide into new agey utopianism (Crichton did it in a most refreshing way, in his "Sphere", very comparable in setting and atmosphere). Without this deeper perspective, the rendezvous with Rama is a compelling but ultimately a rather trivial anecdote in the history of mankind.