|
| The Dumbest Generation: How the Digital Age Stupefies Young Americans and Jeopardizes Our Future (Or, Don't Trust Anyone Under 30) | 
 enlarge | Author: Mark Bauerlein
Publisher: Tarcher
Category: Book
List Price: $24.95
Buy New: $7.35
You Save: $17.60 (71%)
New (48) Used (12) from $7.35
Avg. Customer Rating:  43 reviews
Sales Rank: 9548
Media: Hardcover
Edition: 1
Number Of Items: 1
Pages: 272
Shipping Weight (lbs): 1
Dimensions (in): 8.9 x 6.1 x 1.1
ISBN: 1585426393
Dewey Decimal Number: 302.231
EAN: 9781585426393
ASIN: 1585426393
Publication Date: May 15, 2008
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
|
| Customer Reviews:
 Here's Generation D's Failing Report Card August 15, 2008
6 out of 12 found this review helpful
[Fred Allen, radio/TV comedian of the 50s, once "predicted" that the then mass of new TV-watchers would eventually have "brains the size of peas and eyeballs the size of cantelopes" if they didn't get the excesses of the"vast wasteland" (words of then FCC Chairman, Newton Minnow) -watching under control. Well...] Seems we just may have reached the point Allen had in mind, our having fostered a generation who's life is routinely about being glued to all kinds of electronic screens...not to mention getting musically iWired, making big money, looking good and having fun
Nevermind brain-power enhancement. For youngsters, gaining knowledge, writing, shaping values, and just plain reading are not the "cool" things to do these days.
--Or so author and university English professor Mark Bauerlein claims. Risking minor wrath of 12-to-29-year-olds by describing their lifestyles as mind-dulling and narrow, he describes a youthful way of life that's devoid of the curiosities of even everyday learning. --But lest the reader be fooled that this is a book repleat with armchair opinion, here's one bold, serious effort that takes on a generation in need of a mind-set overhaul, a generation unashamed of its open apathy toward reading and learning --and what it means for all of us. The book makes its point relying on a myriad of convincing references, results, and conclusions from studies, surveys by reputable academic think tanks, associations, ed boards, conferences and committees.
In fact, sometimes the read gets a little dry with all the numbers, percentages, comparisons, charts, quotes and definitions offered. Indeed, The Dumbest Generation [the book, that is] is not a loose work designed to lampoon a vulnerable, younger people. Quite the opposite, it's an up-close examination of the relationship between lack of learning and disdain for reading...and a resulting dismal future for our democracy. At first, this sounds like a stretch, but Bauerlein is a credible voice and does a good job showing we've got a problem on our hands: a generation of very capable youth...that openly rejects the past, rejects authority and mentors, rejects schoolwork...only to fill the void with over-abundant screen-watching, never-ending peer contact, time-consuming jobs, and dreaming about/planning for hefty future incomes.
We find out our "kids" know little about math, tradition, history, philpsophy, art, current events, science, the world around them...and, says Bauerline, we're going to pay for it. He claims the low levels of general knowledge comes from too much time spent in self-serving, ego- boosting activities...like texting & iPoding & watching TV, web surfing, playing video games, and more. The author claims "Generation D," shall we say, reads little, spells poorly and writes even worse....and doesn't much care about the difficiencies.
He takes no cheap shots. Bauerlein drills into nobody and affixes little blame but does make a sound case, outlining how too much Internet and too little reading have lead to poor general knowledge, which ultimately results in the demise of a democracy. [Appropriately, he includes a good reference to Jefferson and his comments about "a literate electorate...."]Our author puts his research of "how it is" out for all of us to think about...as he concludes that declining values, a reduced quality of life and crumbling political process are in store.
Unfortunately, the book falls short in making no clear connection between youth's passion for electronic gear and fun-time...and the the multinational corporations' infatuation with youth's cash. That marketeers expect billion$ and billion$ from this group annually is no small point, and "getting smarter" almost Requires the rejection of (at least some of) the hip, modern, "cool" electronic toys the 12-to-29ers infectiously require. ["I couldn't live without my cell phone," laments one of The Generation's respondents in the book.] We get only passing notes on the enormous pressures put on them to buy. Bauerline might
have shown some cause and effect. Why not here and now address the relationship between pandering companies and low achievement? As there's, apparently, no money in getting smarter these days, Bauerline passes up a perfectly good opportunity to briefly clarify...even though up front he tells us that the scope of this book is limited and would not include
such examinations.
So, the Internet's the culprit in all this window-watching the young generation's "into"? --Hard to disagree, especially when we see so much of youth culture forever plugged-in, on-line, and checked-out. An important, laudable work...yet the author is apt to make some mad --like middle school and university teachers who, he claims, have lost the responsibility for teaching kids to learn How To Learn --like some members of "Generation D" who (unfortunately) may criticize this laudable work as an personal affront instead of a blueprint for change. [--But, then again, they'd had to have Read The Book first....] Given that the intellibots of the "dumbest generation" are, in fact, great at mastering Web offerings, Blackberry and cell phone manipulation, and 40-level video-game challenges, 50s funnyman Fred Allen probably should have included: "...and thumbs the girth of tree stumps."
 Children reflect on their parents August 20, 2008
5 out of 16 found this review helpful
And if the children can't make it, the elder generation has to be responsible. This sort of smug bashing is not helping anyone.
 I am part of the so-called "dumbest generation" and I liked the book September 30, 2008
5 out of 5 found this review helpful
As said above, I am part of the generation that Bauerlein calls "the dumbest." I was born in 1984 and had the good luck to be raised by parents who always encouraged intellectual curiosity. I also went to some pretty decent public primary and secondary schools. But many people haven't shared my good fortune.
Some of the reviews here exemplify the kind of mentality that Bauerlein discusses in his book: kids who are apparently convinced that any knowledge that they already have, regardless of how superficial or paltry it might be, is perfectly sufficient; people who are not only ignorant, but are aware of their own ignorance and consider it no obstacle to voicing whatever uninformed opinion bubbles up in their heads, like the guy who said he hadn't read the book and had no intention of doing so.
That they have this attitude is not entirely their fault, since many of them attended schools where climbing out of the ignorance that all of us are born into was considered optional, lack of effort was no bar to moving up through the grades, and academic rigor was thought of as a cruel imposition on their innocent lives of play or perhaps (horrors) "elitist." Their peer environment was little help, as it punished those with a taste for academic work by calling them "nerds" or simply ignoring them.
The "peer environment" theme is probably the strongest point in the book -- that kids are spending more time with each other, reinforcing the idea that the only thing that matters is the immediate, the present, and fun times spent among one's own age group; adults and their works are boring and irrelevant except insofar as they provide cash and new ways of connecting with friends. Of course, this is the same "extended childhood + prolonged adolescence" cluster of ideas that psychologists and sociologists have been toying with for decades, but I think it is worth considering.
Does Bauerlein *conclusively* establish the idea that this generation is "the dumbest?" I don't think so. He presents some statistics, yes, but the data I have read outside of the book looks equivocal to me. What he does establish, I think, is the existence of a steep decline in the reading of books for pleasure, and a decline in the *desire* (if not ability) to think about complex arguments and current events. These trends merit concern. As for the big question -- "What is to be done?" -- given Bauerlein's belief that the "dumbness" is primarily a result of extracurricular lifestyle, not of education practices, it seems logical that he would be pessimistic, and predictably the book ends with foreboding.
Dr. Males, the writer of the best negative review here, says that the book comes across as self-congratulatory, and parts of it certainly do. Members of the brainy class have always been complaining that the coming generations fail to measure up to their standards of intellectual excellence, and that conditions are looking ever-darker for the causes of academia, informed government, civil society...so I naturally look at these kinds of jeremiads with some skepticism, conscious that the complaints are old ones even if the specific circumstances vary. In the early nineteenth century, Thoreau complained that nobody read serious literature or classics anymore. Maybe we just have to accept that the audience for complex literary works has always been and *will always be* small, and that few people in *any era* will take on philosophical meditation or serious political involvement as a habit.
Depending on your view of the merits of different media types, you may think that substituting web-browsing for book-reading is a bad trend, a neutral one, or even a good one. I see it mostly as a bad one, and I say this as a guy who for years spent hours and hours of each day on discussion boards, social networking sites, and YouTube, only to once again make book-reading my main pastime when I concluded that most of my time online had done me more harm than good.
That was just my own experience, of course, and maybe others see things differently. Anyway, life's too short to throw away most of it sitting in front of a screen. I think I'll go read a book. :-)
 The end of America's intellectual legacy? August 10, 2008
4 out of 12 found this review helpful
"The Dumbest Generation" by Mark Bauerlein is an unabashed and curmudgeonly critique of the poor intellectual habits of America's youth. A Professor of English at Emory University, Mr. Bauerlein takes aim at his many peers in the education establishment who have far too often pandered to students by promoting self-esteemism, arguing that what students need most is a reality check about their capabilities and shortcomings if they are to properly prepare themselves for success and self-fulfillment later in life. While this courageous book is destined to generate a great deal of controversary, it should also stimulate much-needed discussion about what might be done to ensure that America's intellectual legacy does not end but somehow carries on into the future.
Mr. Bauerlein provides ample evidence to support his thesis that the vast majority of today's youths are being dumbed-down by their immersion into a technologically-mediated frenzy of puerile peer group interactivity. Mr. Bauerlein believes that the seductiveness of pop culture and the allure of screen imagery serves to distract and impede study, demonstrating that student proficiencies in critical disciplines such as civics, math, science and engineering have descended to abysmal levels. The author contends that ignorance across a range of subjects has stifled critical thinking skills and threatens to shut down the pipeline of young intellectuals who may be capable of the kind of thoughtful discourse that is required to maintain a healthy democracy.
A great merit of the book is Mr. Bauerlein's debunking of the purported benefits of technology in enhancing the student learning experience. Mr. Bauerlein persuasively argues that mastery using gadgets such as cell phones, MP3 players, video games, Web browsers and the like may have some limited benefit pertaining to careerism but certainly not for the acquisition of knowledge. Revealing the failures of expensive technology initiatives to improve test scores, Mr. Bauerlein suggests that the majority of youths who navigate only within a narrowly-circumscribed universe of narcissistic social networking sites have only succeeded in isolating themselves from the cultural inheritance bequeathed to them by prior generations; precipitous declines in leisure reading, museum outings and other behavioral indicators lends credence to the author's concerns.
As we struggle to understand some of the reasons why our unprecedented access to information has thus far failed to lead us closer to enlightenment, we would do well to read Mr. Bauerlein's timely book.
The Answer Book July 23, 2008
3 out of 9 found this review helpful
If you are wondering why Britney Spears gets more air time than the Iraq or the other pressing problems of the world then this book is for you. This book should be required reading for every parent and every teacher in America. I think it confirms what people have been seeing already. How kids know technology but seem not to know content. The book shows how reason, logic and independent thought is disappearing from the country side.
The author, Mark Bauerlein attacks one of the biggest embedded lies in America. He does this head on, not from the side. This idea is that we are smarter than ever before because of computers. The new age of computers demands new ways of educating. This idea which has swept America is that computers by itself will save us and ensure the future. Somehow the technology that gives us Britney 24/7 and the vivid video games in the living room will also magically educate our kids. Technology will solve it all cry some.
Mark shows the idiocy of that idea in stunning detail. His points are very well documented from a variety of sources. The book is easy to read and flows well. The author first highlights the problem. The statistics are very clear, we aren't getting any smarter in spite of the growing use of technology in our lives. Then Mark shows how the educational institution has changed. Computers are being used more in education. Tests show they don't produce smarter kids. Standards are being lowered in the name of adapting to the "new age". This new age demands new procedures. Many in schools say this new age should be met all via computers.
Mark then shows how this constant barrage of the internet, technology and lower educational expectations has taken it's cost. Students do what students have done for centuries. When left to themselves they take the route of least resistance. They are studying less and focusing on stupid stuff. Instead of doing homework time is being filled with TV watching, chatting on web sites like myspace, and concerning themselves with such horrors as Britney Spear's life over other important things like history or science. This formula of constant stimulation for pleasure has eroded people's ability to reason, gather facts, and communicate.
Mark does point fingers, appropriately. He has a whole chapter that shows this problem is one of many problems society has to deal with from the 60s. The current teachers of today were the students of the 60s. The liberal attitudes then have become the liberal practices of today in the class room. The impact cuts across political lines. Arguments now come from catch phrases mentioned on talk shows or on web sites. They don't come from the great thinkers of the age or from the ideas and issues themselves.
The impact of this is degrading of the country. Our economic power is at stake. Students aren't getting the skills they need to compete in the world. They don't have an understanding of the world but they know who won American Idol. They graduate from college stuck in a perpetual childhood of sorts. He calls them Twixters. This erosion of independent thought threatens the nation. It creates people who will buy anything shinny as they do on web sites or something slick like what they see on TV or the computer screen, not what is right. This leads to election of people who might not be the best for the country.
I think everyone will love this book. It will open up your eyes in a new way.
|
|
|
Powered by Associate-O-Matic
| |
