Generation Kill: Devil Dogs, Iceman, Captain America, and the New Face of American War

Location: Home » h.r. giger » Military » Generation Kill: Devil Dogs, Iceman, Captain America, and the New Face of American War

Similar Items:

•	One Bullet Away: The Making of a Marine Officer
•	Generation Kill
•	No True Glory: A Frontline Account of the Battle for Fallujah
•	House to House: A Soldier's Memoir
•	My War: Killing Time in Iraq

Editorial Reviews:

Product Description
Based on the author's National Magazine Award-winning series in Rolling Stone, this New York Times bestseller offers a firsthand account of the first warriors of the current generation to enter the Iraq War.

Customer Reviews: Read 175 more reviews...

5 out of 5 stars

The one embed account you should read December 16, 2004
124 out of 130 found this review helpful

If you can only read one account of the Iraq War, this should be it. Wright spent about a month with a squad of recon Marines -- essentially the special forces of the corps -- and his account is nothing short of gripping.

It is also exhausting, as Wright subjects the reader to a full range of emotion -- from joy to appalling horror to pride. Wright has a keen eye for the details that bring the stories of the war to life. The banter between the soldiers is fascinating and frequently hilarious, and is definitely a highlight of the book. No other account brings you closer to the men who slugged this thing out as they barreled across the Iraqi desert.

It is useful to keep in mind that this book calls the shots as they are seen from a small group of soldiers on the frontline of the war. What this book is not is a comprehensive overview of the run-up to the war or of the overall strategy employed by the U.S. military. The soldiers often gripe about certain officers and decisions taken at the higher levels. Some of the complaints are balanced out with alternate views. Wright's account is valuable not for its even-handed treatment of every side in a particular issue, but for giving insight into how the men on the ground met and dealt with problems that cropped up during their historic mission.

The book does dwell on a lot of the mishaps encountered by the soldiers. Among the headaches endured by Wright's squad: a lack of lubricating oil to keep their weapons functioning properly, muffed radio communication thanks to incompatible encryption, and general cluelessness about the true nature of their mission, which was basically to drive through enemy positions to draw fire so their position/size/strength could be estimated.

As with any good reporter, Wright plays the facts pretty straight. There isn't much here that is partisan one way or the other. He doesn't shy away from showing the sheer horror of war, such as the case of the Iraqi driver who had the top of his head scooped out by a bullet, leaving braindead but technicaly alive, with a beating heart and working lungs as he sat at the wheel of his vehicle. Nor does Wright paper over Saddam's brutal regime, and there are several scenes in which cheering crowds lined the streets to joyously welcome the Marines.

The book's title is outrageously sensationalistic, and while at the start Wright seems poised to cast the entire adventure as a tale of ultra-violent American youth numbed by years of Hollywood action flicks and bloody video games, that theme is quickly left behind.

Indeed, it would be difficult to make generalizations about American troops based on this book. On the one hand, you have extremely intelligent and upright men that represent the best of America, such as the guys who essentially shame an officer into authorizing a helicopter evacuation for an Iraqi kid who was accidentally shot. On the other hand, there are examples of sheer incandescent idiocy, such as the guy who remarks how cool it would have been to drop the atomic bombs on Japan and kill a quarter million people.

Highly recommended.

5 out of 5 stars

80% Accurate, 20% Interpretation August 6, 2004
115 out of 118 found this review helpful

This book covers what we at 1st Recon called "The Best Spring Break Ever". Wright does an outstanding job accurately portraying the personalities of the operators of Bravo company. As a member of Charlie and H&S company I can verify that he is fairly accurate in his recalling of most events our Battalion faced. The only thing I found inaccurate is that he portrays many Officers to be incompetent. In reality there was a few morons in charge, but the vast majority were fairly good guys. This is fairly standard throughout the military. Also he took a lot of the things we said out of context and interpreted it to make us sound angry all the time(except Tim B., he really is angry all the time). All in all this book is 80%fact 20%spin. Regardless, it captures the general feelings and experiences that we in 1st Recon lived through.
-November Echo four Romeo
S.S.D.

5 out of 5 stars

Must Reading For Both Sides of the Political Spectrum September 9, 2004
93 out of 103 found this review helpful

Whether you were for or against Gulf War II, this is essential reading about it. Rolling Stone writer Wright was embedded with an elite U.S. Marine reconnaissance unit that was often at the "tip of the point of the spear" during the invasion of Iraq. He spent approximately two months with them, riding shotgun in a Humvee as they were used as ambush-bait in the push north. The result is brilliant front-lines reportage that's at turns harrowing, hilarious, shocking, and chaoticoreflecting the reality of combat at its most basic level. The book's title is provocative, designed to sell rather than describe the contents. And yet, Wright does have something to say about the new generation of American soldiers sent to fight in Iraq: "These young men represent what is more or less America's first generation of disposable children. More than half of the guys in the platoon come from broken homes and were raised by absentee, single, working parents. Many are on more intimate terms with video games, reality TV shows and Internet porn than they are with their own parents."

Based on that excerpt, one might expect Wright to go on to provide a litany of the unit's worst excesses and examples of Marine Corps machismo and arrogance. Thankfully, he instead is interested in the men and not stereotypes, and manages to gain acceptance among them. Some have critiqued the book for thisoessentially saying that because Wright became tight with these Marines, he couldn't be objective about their actions. While it would be absurd to suggest that Wright operated under total objectivity, as a critique, it doesn't hold up. Most of the book is Wright just writing about what he sees happen and recounts the feelings the men share with him about their experiences. And it's not as if he sugarcoats his two months with themoplenty of screwups and bad mojo make their way into the pages.

Those with illusions about high tech modern warfare will read in astonishment as duststorms blind all electronic reconnaissance, guns break down for lack of lubricant, thermal imagers aren't available due to battery shortages, and radios from different units can't communicate due to incompatible encryption keys. Alas, the bad news doesn't end there, the unit Wright rides with is sent into tactical situations they're unprepared for, in vehicles they have little experience in, replying on some weapons they've hardly ever trained on, and later on, supported by a reservist unit of DEA and LAPD officers who are total cowboys.

On the plus side, Wright is scrupulous in detailing how attentive the soldiers are to the rules of engagement, and goes to great lengths to explain how the fog of war operates and can lead to civilian casualties. And when civilians are killed due to lapses of discipline, Wright doesn't have to point it out, the Marines he's rides with do it for him. What's perhaps the most surprising thing about the book is how upset some of the Marines get by the scenes they witness. And then again, he does recount the excitement some of the soldiers felt at unleashing spectacular acts of destruction. Another criticism of the book is that he vilifies "all" the officers, usually by recounting the griping of the men under them. The truth is that there are two officers in particular ("Captain America" and "Encino Man") who do come across as dangerously incompetent, and Wright's account makes it very clear why the enlisted men lost all confidence in their leadership. Indeed if one reads between the lines, there's a critique of how the military lets middle-grade officers sit behind desks for ten years and then expects them to perform on the battlefield when they have morphed into mangers.

One could go on and on about the other aspects of the war Wright writes about with clarity: how the chain of command works (or doesn't), the addictive adrenaline rush of being shot at, how the soldiers kept themselves hepped up on ephedra, the deep cynicism many Marines have for the war, and how ultimately, "The invasion all comes down to a bunch of extremely tense young men in their late teens and twenties with their finders on the triggers of rifles and machine guns." Perhaps the most telling thing about the book is that the soldiers he was embedded with have stood by his warts and all account as being truthfuloat least one has even posted his support on Amazon. Wright recounts how one Marine writes constantly to his wife, saying"If something happens to me, I want my wife to know the truth. If they say we fought valiantly here, I want her to know we fought retarded." For those who don't have relatives at the front lines, Wright's book is the first-hand account we should be reading in order to get a true picture of the cost and consequences of going to war.

1 out of 5 stars

Sergeant, First Recon: This Book Is A Lie. Evan Wright Will Never Embed, Again. November 12, 2005
92 out of 148 found this review helpful

GENERATION KILL is a lie. Evan Wright has fabricated quotations,
incorrectly written and placed captions, and he will never
embed with my unit again. 1st Marine Division PAO should
be ashamed, ashamed that it placed him with us. He really
stabbed us in the back and we will never allow him in
our presence again. Also, he understands nothing about
reconnaissance, basic military tactics and operations,
and the fact that he has never returned to Iraq since
he made a mint off our blood, sweat and tears speaks
for itself. And having recently met the brave and bold
American Marine infantry veteran and author, Mike Tucker,
on missions in Western Iraq, I can only recommend to
all readers that they read and enjoy real insight into
the war in Iraq in Mike Tucker's two magnificent books,
HELL IS OVER: VOICES OF THE KURDS AFTER SADDAM and
AMONG WARRIORS IN IRAQ. 1st RECON is back in Iraq and
so is Mike Tucker. I wish I could give GENERATION
KILL 5,000 negative stars, for the way Evan Wright
stabbed us in the back and the way 1st MarDiv PAO
shafted us. 1 star.

1 out of 5 stars

A CASE STUDY IN THE STOCKHOLM SYNDROME June 22, 2004
75 out of 133 found this review helpful

As a former Marine and a connoisseur of war literature, I read "Generation Kill" with great interest. While I thought the book did a passable job of describing the war as it unfolded, I found the author's lazy prose and thin research to be disagreeable. "Generation Kill" is essentially a loose collection of flippant observations tacked together with innumerable rumors, myths and other apocrypha conveyed to him by the Marines he was embedded with (such saucy rumors no doubt delighted his editors back in Los Angeles). Because I'm familiar with the events he describes I'm able to debunk a lot of the misguided characterizations and errata he offers up, but most civilian readers, lacking such insights might think that Wright knows his business, which he does not. It was quite obvious to me as I read the book that Wright had done virtually no fact-checking or re-interviewing and never spoke with any Marines outside of the platoon he lived with for the course of the invasion. This type of writing works for Rolling Stone magazine where portions of the book first appeared but in a hardcover book pretending to compete with the likes of "Black Hawk Down," it simply doesn't fly and Wright's stunning lack of research results in numerous errors which are glaringly obvious to anyone familiar with the US military. (He repeatedly misconstrues aircraft, munition types and US military doctrine and training).

Put simply, Wright failed to do his homework, hoping to get by on pure enthusiasm alone, and it shows.

After reading through this misguided tome I was struck by the visceral power of the Stockholm Syndrome (which causes hostages to identify with their captors) and blown away at how easily civilians are swayed by gun-toting servicemen who speak convincingly about warfare. Wright is, in my mind, a well-paid war tourist and was quite obviously so enamored with his newfound comrades that he felt no need to double-check on any of the myths and slander that his subjects floated in his general direction.(In their defense, they probably didn't realize that Wright was going to publish their off-hand comments as established fact.) In "Generation Kill," Wright commits the cardinal sin of journalism: he presents opinion as fact and fails to corroborate many of his assertions. This book inadvertently reveals much of what is wrong with American journalism today. Buyer Beware.

Recommended instead: STORM ON THE HORIZON: KHAFJI--THE BATTLE THAT CHANGED THE COURSE OF THE GULF WAR by David Morris.

Powered by Associate-O-Matic